TensorFlow

Infrastructure

cloud gpu deployment

SHOW HN2015

77points
12comments
#347of 2,565 in 2015
Top 14%of 2015 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

0 positive, 2 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 5 critical, out of 9 comments about the project. Thread score -0.38.

Execution: 0 for, 2 againstDocs: 0 for, 2 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Maker responsive to feedback and updated the README and build

    From 2 comments
    • Thanks for the feedback! I've added a note to the README that support is still experimental. I'll be tracking the issue and updating the repo + AMI as it develops. Will be…
      alexkern on HN
    • Updated to the latest commit, works for me! :)
      alexkern on HN

Objections

  • CUDA 3.0 support causes NaNs and unreliable training

    From 2 comments
    • Honestly, there are enough issues with TensorFlow right now due to CUDA 3.0 that using it with AWS is highly problematic. I appreciate the author's attempt, but there's no way…
      Smerity on HN
    • Thanks, would be good to have multiple sources of verification that HEAD now supports this natively without issues like unexpected NaNs.…
      vrv on HN
  • Recipe failed: AMI was region-specific and the link was broken

    From 3 comments
    • Top link points to a non-existent AMI so this "recipe" -- like almost every "here's how to ..." recipe on GitHub that gets posted on HN -- doesn't work. I swear, it's like 100%…
      tacos on HN
    • I tried with the Oregon region and it failed. I changed to the N. California region and it worked. (No comment about the GPU though.)
      droque on HN
    • An AMI id is region-specific, the original poster should probably have mentioned what region he created the AMI in.
      fred256 on HN
  • Multi-GPU g2.8xlarge not faster than g2.2xlarge

    From 1 comment
    • I think the nan issue you are referring to was caused by some weird stuff with Bazel. I put together an AMI in virginia: ami-cf5028a5 and if you have a masochistic streak, here…
      erikbern on HN
  • Google docs list GPU as unsupported

    From 1 comment
    • Top link points to a non-existent AMI so this "recipe" -- like almost every "here's how to ..." recipe on GitHub that gets posted on HN -- doesn't work. I swear, it's like 100%…
      tacos on HN

Requests

  • Verification that HEAD supports CUDA without NaNs

    From 1 comment
    • Thanks, would be good to have multiple sources of verification that HEAD now supports this natively without issues like unexpected NaNs.…
      vrv on HN

Questions

  • Why multi-GPU instances do not scale under Xen virtualization

    From 1 comment
    • Xen virtualization disables P2P copies ergo GPUs have what we call a "failure to communicate and some GPUs you just can't reach (without going through the CPU that is)."
      varelse on HN

Alternatives named

  • Running TensorFlow locally on a laptop or phone

    From 1 comment
    • Honestly, there are enough issues with TensorFlow right now due to CUDA 3.0 that using it with AWS is highly problematic. I appreciate the author's attempt, but there's no way…
      Smerity on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/10555692)