CodeMill

Web and SaaS

freelance marketplace

SHOW HN2016

169points
80comments
#183of 2,264 in 2016
Top 9%of 2016 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

2 positive, 17 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 31 critical, out of 52 comments about the project. Thread score -0.53.

Design: 0 for, 14 againstIdea: 0 for, 7 againstPricing: 0 for, 4 againstExecution: 0 for, 2 againstDocs: 0 for, 2 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Interesting idea for open source and task funding

    From 3 comments
    • Interesting. Cool idea. Thanks for the post! Just guessing, but wouldn't it work better as a 2-phase process? Phase 1 you set a price on automated acceptance tests. Phase 2…
      DanielBMarkham on HN
    • Unbelievable,Awesome
      sandra_saltlake on HN
    • I really like general idea. I was thinking along the same lines. Essentially by splitting your work well, the skill that I have as experienced dev, you can get a lot of people…
      desireco42 on HN

Objections

  • Site scroll hijacking makes browsing hard

    From 4 comments
    • BountySource (https://www.bountysource.com/) is a similar thing which is well established and doesn't mess up my browser's scrolling.
      kennydude on HN
    • The custom scrolling on the site bothers me a bit. Its really cumbersome when you are using a trackpad, and it does not scroll the way you expect to. It also prevents me using…
      thecatspaw on HN
    • Even with a scrolly-heely mouse it sucks. My OS has a perfectly good scrolling mechanism, stop messing with it! Especially when the result is worse!
      jalfresi on HN
    • Went to website, noticed scroll override, closed site. If you're inexperienced enough to think scroll overrides are ever a good idea, your product probably sucks way more.
      EC1 on HN
  • Payment not guaranteed; repo owner can reject or change price

    From 3 comments
    • Typo: > you can unassgin them Anyway, this seems interesting. But as a developer who completes pull requests, what's to make sure I actually get paid? The buyer could easily…
      michaelmior on HN
    • Plus, the repo owner can change the price at any time, from what I gather.
      JetSpiegel on HN
    • Interesting, but they should make it more clear how does it work legally - i.e. are there guarantees built in that the repo owner won't discard the pull request, and then use the…
      mnx on HN
  • Name evokes diploma mill

    From 1 comment
    • I don't like the name. It immediately makes me think "diploma mill," which signifies cheapness and inauthenticity.
      maxwelljoslyn on HN
  • Open tasks hard to find; dashboard UX confusing

    From 3 comments
    • I'd suggest making that more obvious somehow. Before seeing this comment, I had no idea how to see open tasks that are looking for developers to take.
      bignis on HN
    • Same problem here. Sign-in with github was very nice. Then drops me into the dashboard. Open tasks are 0. Its a UX dead end.
      donpdonp on HN
    • Mine is empty = zero tasks as well.
      cel1ne on HN

Requests

  • Clearer legal terms and protection for developers

    From 2 comments
    • Interesting, but they should make it more clear how does it work legally - i.e. are there guarantees built in that the repo owner won't discard the pull request, and then use the…
      mnx on HN
    • So (effectual or not) attempts to protect consumers from developers not delivering. What symmetric mechanisms do you have in mind to protect developers? How are you handling…
      ska on HN
  • Fix scroll behaviour

    From 2 comments
    • It's awful beyond words, you should never ever mess with the user's scroll. If themes have it just delete the feature entirely.
      Exuma on HN
    • Well.. smoothscroll.js This removes it if you wanted to A/B test it ``` window.removeEventListener("mousewheel", ssc_wheel) ``` I don't find it that bad but it's a bit more janky…
      asdfaoeu on HN
  • Automated acceptance tests as a pricing basis

    From 1 comment
    • Interesting. Cool idea. Thanks for the post! Just guessing, but wouldn't it work better as a 2-phase process? Phase 1 you set a price on automated acceptance tests. Phase 2…
      DanielBMarkham on HN

Questions

  • How are developers paid if the client rejects the PR?

    From 1 comment
    • Typo: > you can unassgin them Anyway, this seems interesting. But as a developer who completes pull requests, what's to make sure I actually get paid? The buyer could easily…
      michaelmior on HN
  • Does it work for large codebases?

    From 1 comment
    • This seem like a good idea but in practise i am not sure how this will work for large codebase where more time is spent on understanding and guessing where to make a modification…
      elcoderloco on HN

Alternatives named

  • BountySource

    From 2 comments
    • BountySource (https://www.bountysource.com/) is a similar thing which is well established and doesn't mess up my browser's scrolling.
      kennydude on HN
    • Like Bountysource?
      dublinben on HN
  • Gitcoin-like donation pledges for issues

    From 1 comment
    • For FLOSS you could let users put donations on an issue, whenever the pot gets large enough for a developer to take interest they'll work on it. That way you don't need to…
      supergreg on HN
  • Snowdrift.coop

    From 1 comment
  • Upwork

    From 1 comment
    • see upwork and head hunter fees. Also groupon et al. 10% is cheap/norm.
      maerF0x0 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/11282344)