Little Warden

Infrastructure

website monitoring

SHOW HN2017

109points
30comments
#411of 2,242 in 2017
Top 19%of 2017 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

4 positive, 2 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 3 critical, out of 11 comments about the project. Thread score +0.04.

Pricing: 2 for, 2 againstIdea: 2 for, 0 againstExecution: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful idea that checks things people forget after launch

    From 2 comments
    • This seems like a great idea. I would be interested in detecting 404's as well. This would need to be configurable because not all 404's you care about, but some you likely do.…
      kylegalbraith on HN
    • Would love this if it also checked 404 assets and links.
      pudo on HN
  • Pricing is reasonable for commercial sites

    From 2 comments
    • don't listen to anyone who thinks $20/month is 'prohibitively' expensive for anyone who runs a commercial website, i.e. one that shouldn't go down over a small oversite like…
      flachsechs on HN
    • The pricing is completely reasonable; we are probably going to get the £400/year plan as an agency. I agree the £6 single domain pricing could be more visible. Take advice from…
      1123581321 on HN

Objections

  • Too expensive for personal or small websites with no revenue

    From 3 comments
    • Looks neat, but it's prohibitively expensive to use for a personal website which doesn't generate revenue. I use CloudFlare (at $5/mo), but close to $17/mo for this service…
      tristor on HN
    • Nice idea and execution. But at £ 15 for the least expensive plan, and no free starter plan for say, just single domain owners, I think this might be prohibitively expensive for…
      justboxing on HN
    • > don't listen to anyone who thinks $20/month is 'prohibitively' expensive for anyone who runs a commercial website I'm telling you from practical experience. I've helped several…
      justboxing on HN
  • No free tier for single-domain owners

    From 2 comments
    • I would love to see a free version for just one domain.
      marcofloriano on HN
    • Nice idea and execution. But at £ 15 for the least expensive plan, and no free starter plan for say, just single domain owners, I think this might be prohibitively expensive for…
      justboxing on HN
  • Payment flow bugs: repeated payment prompts and a 404 after payment

    From 1 comment
    • When your pricing page says "10 checks per URL" etc what does it mean? I assume it means that more things are checked as you move up the tiers but I couldn't find any table of…
      mabcat on HN
  • Pricing page does not explain what each tier checks

    From 1 comment
    • When your pricing page says "10 checks per URL" etc what does it mean? I assume it means that more things are checked as you move up the tiers but I couldn't find any table of…
      mabcat on HN

Requests

  • Free or low-cost plan for single domain

    From 3 comments
    • I would love to see a free version for just one domain.
      marcofloriano on HN
    • Looks neat, but it's prohibitively expensive to use for a personal website which doesn't generate revenue. I use CloudFlare (at $5/mo), but close to $17/mo for this service…
      tristor on HN
    • Nice idea and execution. But at £ 15 for the least expensive plan, and no free starter plan for say, just single domain owners, I think this might be prohibitively expensive for…
      justboxing on HN
  • Detect 404 pages and broken links and assets

    From 2 comments
    • This seems like a great idea. I would be interested in detecting 404's as well. This would need to be configurable because not all 404's you care about, but some you likely do.…
      kylegalbraith on HN
    • Would love this if it also checked 404 assets and links.
      pudo on HN
  • Make the single-site plan more visible on the pricing page

    From 2 comments
    • There seems to be a £6/€8/$10 plan for one site, though it's barely visible under the primary pricing. I think it should be made a little more visible - less prominent than the…
      TeMPOraL on HN
    • The pricing is completely reasonable; we are probably going to get the £400/year plan as an agency. I agree the £6 single domain pricing could be more visible. Take advice from…
      1123581321 on HN

Questions

  • What checks are included at each pricing tier

    From 1 comment
    • When your pricing page says "10 checks per URL" etc what does it mean? I assume it means that more things are checked as you move up the tiers but I couldn't find any table of…
      mabcat on HN
  • Whether SSL monitoring is independent of the certificate provider

    From 1 comment
    • Yes, but that's based on their information, it's not "monitoring". Monitoring is an external system not influenced by the others which observes and reports. It'd be nice to be…
      tristor on HN

Alternatives named

  • Expirify, a free SSL expiry checker

    From 1 comment
    • https://secure.expirify.com is a free option that works well. I believe I discovered it on HN.
      jaden on HN
  • certificatemonitor.org

    From 1 comment
  • lnkchk.com, a link checker

    From 1 comment
    • Shameless plug alert! I made something similar +/- some features. https://lnkchk.com
      creatrixcordis on HN
  • Let's Encrypt auto-renewal and provider expiry emails

    From 2 comments
    • Just use letsencrypt, it renews automatically
      tarr11 on HN
    • And even if you don’t set that up they still email you when it’s about to expire
      Karunamon on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/15199067)