Pageforest

Dev tools

web app platform

SHOW HN2011

79points
41comments
#145of 1,097 in 2011
Top 14%of 2011 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

2 positive, 4 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 7 critical, out of 13 comments about the project. Thread score -0.28.

Idea: 1 for, 4 againstExecution: 0 for, 3 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Client-side app model with view-source openness is appealing

    From 1 comment
    • I love the idea of developing in the cloud with only js and a db api. The option to "view page source" makes each js app kind of "open" and more trustable. Thanks for sharing…
      FedericoElles on HN
  • Pageforest concept is cool

    From 1 comment
    • It's a great concept. Question - why not just use CouchDB? We've been doing similar app platform stuff with it for years. Check out this wiki that is hosted directly out of…
      jchrisa on HN

Objections

  • 80-line claim is misleading since libraries are excluded

    From 2 comments
    • Hate to nitpick, but blatant linkbait headline. It's not 80 lines of JavaScript. It's 80 lines of javascript + thousands more lines of JavaScript in the form of libraries.
      axod on HN
    • My point, is that "80 lines of javascript" is technically incorrect. There's no point to mention how many lines of code it is, unless it's actually true.
      axod on HN
  • Span elements used for clickable links hurt accessibility

    From 2 comments
    • Not a fan of <span>s that I'm supposed to click. If it's a link, make it an <a>, please.
      jrockway on HN
    • Because random spans don't get hinted, and to click the link, I have to actually reach for my mouse. a and form elements are clickable. Everything else is just plain text. In…
      jrockway on HN
  • Could be built more simply on CouchDB

    From 2 comments
    • It's a great concept. Question - why not just use CouchDB? We've been doing similar app platform stuff with it for years. Check out this wiki that is hosted directly out of…
      jchrisa on HN
    • PageForest uses App Engine to provide a key value storage API with user authentication. CouchDB has these out-of-the-box, so a CouchDB version should be much less code than this…
      jchrisa on HN
  • Contenteditable WYSIWYG is fragile in production

    From 1 comment
    • Have you actually tried using ContentEditable in a production system? If so, I think you'd withdraw your comment. It's hairball.
      jasonkester on HN

Requests

  • Support multiple pages per wiki

    From 1 comment
  • Discuss security tradeoffs of the model

    From 1 comment
    • PageForest looks pretty cool. Anyone want to comment about security concerns of the pageforest model, vs traditional web apps?
      jorgem on HN

Questions

  • Why not use CouchDB instead

    From 1 comment
    • It's a great concept. Question - why not just use CouchDB? We've been doing similar app platform stuff with it for years. Check out this wiki that is hosted directly out of…
      jchrisa on HN
  • Is this really a wiki with only one page

    From 1 comment

Alternatives named

  • CouchDB and CouchApp

    From 1 comment
    • It's a great concept. Question - why not just use CouchDB? We've been doing similar app platform stuff with it for years. Check out this wiki that is hosted directly out of…
      jchrisa on HN
  • AppJet

    From 1 comment
    • "single-page", that reminds me of appjet, a cool hosted SSJS by the authors of etherpad.
      jhrobert on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/2113258)