botium-speech-processing

AI

speech recognition and synthesis

SHOW HN2020

438points
85comments
#69of 3,028 in 2020
Top 3%of 2020 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

6 positive, 13 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 4 critical, out of 25 comments about the project. Thread score +0.09.

Performance: 1 for, 2 againstExecution: 2 for, 1 againstIdea: 1 for, 0 againstDesign: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Polished demo and well-built work

    From 1 comment
    • That's fantastic work and the demo is very well done. Thanks for sharing it. You obviously put a lot of hard work into it. Feels super polished.
      tomcam on HN
  • Easy-to-use API that provides a quick voice boilerplate

    From 2 comments
    • it means: easy to install, easy to use, medium performance. no further know-how needed. compared to the total effort for selecting, training, deploying speech recogniction and…
      ftreml on HN
    • > just a small server, hope that it wont crash when posting > the link here In all honesty I was just looking for some pre-processed examples. The API itself seems intuitive…
      bArray on HN

Objections

  • Text-to-speech quality is robotic and weaker than commercial engines

    From 2 comments
    • I've built a speech synthesis system with Marytts before, it works, but unfortunately, the quality is not very good, HMM and unit selection speech synthesis are now very old…
      ayumu722 on HN
    • > just a small server, hope that it wont crash when posting > the link here In all honesty I was just looking for some pre-processed examples. The API itself seems intuitive…
      bArray on HN
  • Recognition is less accurate than cloud services and Kaldi is outdated compared to newer models

    From 2 comments
    • It is very unlikely a E2E toolkit can outperform kaldi if they're trained on the same data. Also I suspect these guys aren't using the latest kaldi architectures.
      Nimitz14 on HN
    • Cool! Thanks! I've tried both wav2letter and DeepSpeech, and now this, but I get very poor results even with short sentences (compared to Google's proprietary services). Would it…
      z3t4 on HN
  • Large disk requirement of about 40GB

    From 1 comment

Requests

  • Support for more languages

    From 2 comments
    • You should indicate somewhere which languages are supported. You mention Deepspeech German in the credits, but did you use it to implement support for German or just to inform…
      yorwba on HN
    • Which languages are supported?
      ajaviaad on HN
  • Additional STT/TTS backends such as Tacotron2 or wav2letter

    From 3 comments
    • I built something quite similar on my own product. Is there any interest on adding more STT/TTS backends to the software? Think services like Lyrebird or Trint. I could…
      pouta on HN
    • I've built a speech synthesis system with Marytts before, it works, but unfortunately, the quality is not very good, HMM and unit selection speech synthesis are now very old…
      ayumu722 on HN
    • so this is a real cool project. as soon as you finished your training I will be happy to add it as option (or maybe default setup) in the botium speech processing setup (if you…
      ftreml on HN
  • Live demo

    From 2 comments

Questions

  • Which languages are supported

    From 1 comment
  • Performance compared to DeepSpeech, wav2letter and cloud services

    From 2 comments
    • Any idea how it compares to Mozilla's DeepSpeech?
      dsteinman on HN
    • Are there any performance metrics of this versus other offline and cloud based services?
      monkeydust on HN
  • Real-time streaming support

    From 1 comment
    • Any recommendations for a real time solution? I maintain a platform which features live video events we'd like to add captioning and so far can only see IBM Watson providing a…
      CommanderData on HN

Alternatives named

  • Mozilla DeepSpeech

    From 2 comments
    • > deepspeech was evaluated, but right now kaldi provides better performance Was this before the streaming API was added to DeepSpeech? I recently did some testing with it, and it…
      magicalhippo on HN
    • Mozilla DeepSpeech has seen significant improvements in the quality of results it provides (and RAM/CPU usage) since early December, the accuracy of transcriptions has…
      StudentStuff on HN
  • wav2letter++

    From 1 comment
    • Facebook has released wav2letter++. I'd wager that will outperform kaldi by a wide margin.
      grizzles on HN
  • Google and Amazon cloud speech services

    From 1 comment
    • picotts is a command line tool. marytts is a client/server tool. (both included in botium speech processing and callable with curl). high quality with google cloud speech and…
      ftreml on HN
  • Festival speech synthesis

    From 1 comment
    • If marytts is so good, why are we in many linux distros still using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festival_Speech_Synthesis_System as our default tts system?
      bobmaxup on HN
  • CMU Sphinx

    From 1 comment
    • Can anyone in the space expand on why it's increasingly rare to see people using/building on Sphinx[0]? Do people avoid it simply because of an impression that it won't be good…
      hardwaresofton on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/22154088)