Scan Your PDF

Productivity

pdf tool

SHOW HN2020

607points
168comments
#27of 3,028 in 2020
Top 1%of 2020 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

15 positive, 44 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 20 critical, out of 81 comments about the project. Thread score -0.07.

Idea: 6 for, 7 againstExecution: 4 for, 5 againstPrivacy: 1 for, 6 againstPerformance: 1 for, 1 againstDesign: 2 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful solution for organisations demanding scanned signed copies

    From 2 comments
    • I can't believe that I'm saying this but this is soooo needed. It's ridiculous to me how many organizations still require hand-signed copies as if that is somehow a deterrent to…
      dkonofalski on HN
    • This is cool and would be useful from time to time with some stupid organisations that insist for some reason on full scanning. Perhaps one suggestion. Can you update your…
      secfirstmd on HN
  • Clever, fun technical project

    From 2 comments
    • Impressed to see this is your first open source project! What a fantastic blend of simplicity, technology, and wit. I love it. Original (was PDF): https://i.imgur.com/v5nn1ql.png…
      switz on HN
    • Your convert and gs mastery is truly impressive, great job and great project.
      SanchoPanda on HN

Objections

  • Uploading private documents to a server is a privacy risk

    From 2 comments
    • From the github repo, the site is a wrapper around exactly two shell commands. Instead of uploading your data to an untrusted site, you can run from the comfort and safety of…
      jmwilson on HN
    • Haha, great job. There's also something to be said for the grim humour of how technology led us to this point. Sadly, I'd also be extremely wary of sending the kind of documents…
      j_4 on HN
  • Server security issues such as exposed admin and key in repo

    From 2 comments
    • Great you decided to share the source code, but then I was able to see that you let the admin session enabled. you can disable that on production…
      atum47 on HN
    • You may want to purge the key in your repo (settings.py)
      greenknight on HN
  • Scanning signed documents may not satisfy some legal requirements

    From 1 comment
    • But scanning these documents defeats the point. The law isn't saying "it must be signed with wet ink, but after that a scanned copy is sufficient", it says you need the actual…
      lilyball on HN

Requests

  • Add before and after examples on the site

    From 3 comments
    • Pretty cool idea! One suggestion: add thumbnail/preview of how docs will look like after "scanned". Or maybe even a "Before and After" teaser! :)
      newx on HN
    • Suggestion: Include some before/after examples
      raldi on HN
    • can you put an example picture side by side, right on the frontpage
      sergiotapia on HN
  • Offer a desktop or client-side version for private documents

    From 2 comments
    • Can this be done client side so the PDF does not need to be uploaded anywhere?
      electriclove on HN
    • Thanks, I totally agree. That's why I made the code public so you can see what's being run. A friend very privacy-minded told me maybe a desktop app could be used by those who…
      baicunko on HN
  • Add more realistic artifacts like tilt per page and specks

    From 2 comments
    • It looks like what is being used for the transformation is: 1) set to grayscale (optional), 2) add blur, 3) slight rotational tilt, 4) add gaussian blur (?) You can go one…
      doc_gunthrop on HN
    • Suggestion: For multi-page documents, it would be nice to use slightly different rotation parameters for each page.
      leethargo on HN

Questions

  • Is this needed in countries other than the US?

    From 1 comment
    • I live in Germany and I never had anyone telling me that a PDF signed digitally wasn’t enough, especially if they expect you to e-mail it back to them. Is this a US problem?
      camillomiller on HN
  • Can deployment be documented so people can self-host?

    From 2 comments
    • This is cool and would be useful from time to time with some stupid organisations that insist for some reason on full scanning. Perhaps one suggestion. Can you update your…
      secfirstmd on HN
    • That's a pretty cool project. Do you mind explaining your deployment process?
      lilblockchains on HN

Alternatives named

  • Raw ImageMagick and Ghostscript commands run locally

    From 2 comments
    • From the github repo, the site is a wrapper around exactly two shell commands. Instead of uploading your data to an untrusted site, you can run from the comfort and safety of…
      jmwilson on HN
    • I've extracted the oneliner command that runs this into a gist of a simple bash script. I don't want to send my PDFs to an unknown server. Also modified a bit (density and output…
      jduckles on HN
  • FalsiScan

    From 1 comment
    • Show HN: FalsiScan – Make it look like a PDF has been hand signed and scanned (770 points, 34 days ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22811653
      miles on HN
  • Adobe Acrobat or Reader signature and scanning features

    From 2 comments
    • This is basically what Adobe Reader does with its signature feature.
      jschwartzi on HN
    • Not to detract from this, because it is brilliant, and I'll definitely use in the future as a last resort. Before resorting to this, I've found that if I convert the PDF to an…
      yourapostasy on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/23157408)