science

Learning and science

research discussion community

SHOW HN2011

70points
25comments
#177of 1,097 in 2011
Top 17%of 2011 by points

How HN took it

LovedMost comments that take a side are positive

6 positive, 7 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 1 critical, out of 16 comments about the project. Thread score +0.32.

Idea: 4 for, 0 againstDesign: 2 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Good idea to make attribution anonymous but changeable, reducing fear of reputation damage.

    From 1 comment
    • Like any community site there is a serious chicken and egg problem. Even more so in academia where there is a very engrained sense that research and discussion should happen…
      jpallen on HN
  • Simple interface design.

    From 1 comment
    • I know nothing about the science/research community that would be helpful to add - but I really like the direction you're going with the design. Simple interface for content that…
      pauldisneyiv on HN
  • Useful for finding data and papers without expensive sources.

    From 1 comment
    • Kudos on this. Great to see a good place to find this type of data, specially since other sources like Nature are very expensive.
      checoivan on HN

Objections

  • Arxiv subcategories are needed since the full feed is too broad.

    From 1 comment
    • You really need to subdivide all the arxiv sub-disciplines. Noone's going to look at the full arxiv output, there's just too much unrelated stuff for whatever you're looking for.
      lutorm on HN
  • Breaking into non-CS academia will be difficult.

    From 1 comment
    • very interesting. Outside of computer science, it will be very difficult to break through existing academic structures, but if you can find a (responsible and efficient) way to…
      dsebrow on HN
  • Chicken and egg problem of getting users to join.

    From 2 comments
    • Like any community site there is a serious chicken and egg problem. Even more so in academia where there is a very engrained sense that research and discussion should happen…
      jpallen on HN
    • I really want to see some technology mojo pumped into academia. I've spent a fare amount of time thinking about it, so here's an idea dump for you. * A markup feature for people…
      TheEzEzz on HN

Requests

  • Paper markup and annotation features.

    From 1 comment
    • I really want to see some technology mojo pumped into academia. I've spent a fare amount of time thinking about it, so here's an idea dump for you. * A markup feature for people…
      TheEzEzz on HN
  • Rating system for reviewers and manuscript quality.

    From 1 comment
    • I've worked on some medical publications, and you would need a very good rating system. There are all sorts of low-quality manuscripts that uninformed consumers might cling to if…
      dsebrow on HN
  • Tooltips explaining featured paper topic acronyms.

    From 1 comment
    • Just a minor suggestion: I'd add a tooltip for the Featured Papers' topics/categories. The big two letter acronyms took me a second to decipher before I noticed they're all…
      karlmdavis on HN

Questions

  • Have you seen colab or arxiv-based alternatives?

    From 2 comments
    • Is this your project? Have you seen colab[1]? [1] https://github.com/caseywstark/colab [2] http://colabscience.com/
      izak30 on HN
    • You do know about arxiv.org, right? This is the de facto place for preprints in all of the fields that I know of, and is pretty much removing the need for publications…
      saucerful on HN
  • Will people eventually host their own content instead of using middlemen?

    From 1 comment
    • Will there be time when everybody keeps his stuff at his own site and all of these "communities", aggregators, middlemen die out?
      pixcavator on HN

Alternatives named

  • Colab

    From 1 comment
    • Is this your project? Have you seen colab[1]? [1] https://github.com/caseywstark/colab [2] http://colabscience.com/
      izak30 on HN
  • arXiv

    From 1 comment
    • You do know about arxiv.org, right? This is the de facto place for preprints in all of the fields that I know of, and is pretty much removing the need for publications…
      saucerful on HN
  • Voxcharta

    From 1 comment
    • Have you seen http://voxcharta.org/? It does some of what you say. It's mainly focused on being a tool for intradepartment discussions right now.
      lutorm on HN
  • Mendeley

    From 1 comment
    • You could also hook into the Mendeley API. See http://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/
      revorad on HN
  • openprotocols.net

    From 1 comment
    • I think openprotocols.net is doing something along these lines, I remember seeing them mentioned here on HN. Yep: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2191105
      kvh on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/2354276)