Cleanup Photos

Creative

photo editing

SHOW HN2022

Legend

Cleanup Photos

Remove unwanted objects in photos simply by dragging boxes

cleanupphotos.com

#object removal#photo editing#inpainting#watermark removal

319points
118comments
#124of 2,570 in 2022
Top 5%of 2022 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

17 positive, 20 neutral or asking, 5 mixed, 18 critical, out of 60 comments about the project. Thread score +0.02.

Execution: 8 for, 13 againstIdea: 4 for, 1 againstDesign: 1 for, 1 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 againstPricing: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Results are impressive and fast for object removal

    From 4 comments
    • Really nice. I tried removing someone behind a wire grate, and it correctly identified them, replaced the wire grate and filled in the grate holes with decent background imitation.
      mbforbes on HN
    • This produced really impressive results in removing a creased dent in a car door and a pile of rocks from in front of a fence. Both photos were at an oblique angle and I thought…
      Wistar on HN
    • I remember when the smart object removal feature was added to photoshop and it was pretty cool. The fact that you can now get the same functionality working even better in a free…
      orobinson on HN
    • "Even better" is an understatement. This straight blows the Photoshop smart object removal out of the water.
      Wistar on HN
  • Easy and painless to use

    From 2 comments
    • Of course, I had to test it with this photo: https://imgur.com/a/ypyIhB3 Not too bad! Can definitely tell it's been edited, but for a quick removal it was painless.
      michaelchisari on HN
    • Really neat tool!
      terrycody on HN

Objections

  • Site crashed or returned HTTP 500 under HN traffic

    From 3 comments
    • Seems like the endpoints of the service itself now seem to return HTTP 500 for some reason, so once you click on "Remove", nothing happens. Example URL: ```…
      KronisLV on HN
    • Must be HN hugged to death. API responses are returning status code 500.
      gerwim on HN
    • Hmm, in Firefox a progress bar shows for a few seconds after clicking "remove", and then nothing else happens. In Chrome the image disappears and is replaced by a broken image…
      matsemann on HN
  • Outputs are low resolution thumbnail quality

    From 2 comments
    • Ngl both do a pretty great job, OP's may be slightly better even. Unfortunately both output images at thumbnail quality, so it's an academic exercise only and not anything…
      moffkalast on HN
    • @moffkalast, thanks for the feedback! It's currently at 1024 pixels, hope that's not as bad as the experience yesterday. The processing speed will slow down a bit though, hope…
      gc0119 on HN
  • Only works well on some images, leaves dirty blobs

    From 3 comments
    • I tried it but it left a dirty blob where it removed the thing from my photo. A bit underwhelming.
      gardenhedge on HN
    • It only works for beaches ;)
      ape4 on HN
    • I tried with a moderately complex image [0] and it failed to properly remove anything. Edit: saw matsemann's comment - I was using Firefox, where selecting areas and clicking…
      brk on HN
  • Backend-locked, uploads photos to a server

    From 2 comments
    • > We are commited to protecting your data privacy. Your photos will never be saved, so please make sure to download after editing. Email support@cleanupphotos.com. Then why not…
      juunpp on HN
    • Well, now you've made me look like an idiot with the original post. What 'computational resources' are needed here, a 2nd-gen GPU? I think this kind of object removal would be…
      juunpp on HN

Requests

  • Offline or desktop version

    From 2 comments
    • > We are commited to protecting your data privacy. Your photos will never be saved, so please make sure to download after editing. Email support@cleanupphotos.com. Then why not…
      juunpp on HN
    • Well, now you've made me look like an idiot with the original post. What 'computational resources' are needed here, a 2nd-gen GPU? I think this kind of object removal would be…
      juunpp on HN
  • Mobile usability fixes

    From 2 comments

Questions

  • What is the business model and pricing

    From 1 comment
    • Couldn't find the pricing page. Is this free? What's your business model?
      thyrox on HN
  • What AI tasks are behind it

    From 1 comment
    • I'm rather ignorant in that domain, so I wonder if some people could enlighten me. What are the AI tasks behind this? I can identify two steps: - Identifying an approximate shape…
      phh on HN

Alternatives named

  • cleanup.pictures

    From 2 comments
    • this is an alternative i have come across: https://cleanup.pictures/
      swyx on HN
    • seems to be much faster and more user friendly than OP's site and worked also better on one example I tried
      Markoff on HN
  • Photoshop content-aware fill and smart object removal

    From 1 comment
    • I remember when the smart object removal feature was added to photoshop and it was pretty cool. The fact that you can now get the same functionality working even better in a free…
      orobinson on HN
  • Pixel Magic Eraser

    From 1 comment
    • This reminds me of pixels magic eraser technology which I think is specialized for removing people.
      quietthrow on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/32080469)