Scroll

Dev tools

markup language

SHOW HN2022

59points
36comments
#880of 2,570 in 2022
Top 35%of 2022 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

3 positive, 3 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 6 critical, out of 12 comments about the project. Thread score -0.10.

Idea: 1 for, 3 againstExecution: 0 for, 3 againstDesign: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Footnote sidenote and colour ideas admired

    From 2 comments
    • Anyone interested in footnotes might like the way we do it on the Vale site, for example: https://verdagon.dev/blog/making-regions-part-1-human-factor Some nice things: * The…
      verdagon on HN
    • Oh this is beautiful. Thanks for the link.
      breck on HN

Objections

  • Footnote syntax looks like existing markdown footnotes with a harder grammar

    From 2 comments
    • At the risk of Dropboxing myself: what is the advantage of this over the existing Markdown syntax for footnotes[1]? It looks very similar, but with a harder to parse grammar.…
      woodruffw on HN
    • It doesn't have footnotes. Some supersets do.
      bmacho on HN
  • Demo link redirects and the page shows JavaScript errors in Safari

    From 3 comments
    • Clicking on the number should ideal take me to footnote but it isn't. Instead its redirecting to a different page taking about scroll
      iprathik on HN
    • All I get is a blank window in Safari.
      chrstphrknwtn on HN
    • Nope, just JS errors [Error] SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='. Expected an opening '(' before a method's parameter list. (anonymous function) (libs.js:16558) [Error]…
      chrstphrknwtn on HN

Questions

  • What is the advantage over existing markdown footnotes

    From 2 comments
    • At the risk of Dropboxing myself: what is the advantage of this over the existing Markdown syntax for footnotes[1]? It looks very similar, but with a harder to parse grammar.…
      woodruffw on HN
    • I can’t see what this offers over pandoc markdown or it’s successor: https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/jgm/djot/blob/master/doc/syntax.html#footnote-reference
      reagle on HN

Alternatives named

  • Markdown footnotes extensions (Python-Markdown, Hugo)

    From 2 comments
    • Something different. I have been using Markdown Footnotes extension [1] and found its syntax to be natural to Markdown. Here's the same sample as OP in Markdown Footnotes syntax.…
      richsu-ca on HN
    • Yes, for example in Hugo [0] I can do this: This is some text with a footnote.[^1] [^1]: And that's the footnote. [0] https://gohugo.io/
      teekert on HN
  • Pandoc markdown and djot

    From 1 comment
    • I can’t see what this offers over pandoc markdown or it’s successor: https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/jgm/djot/blob/master/doc/syntax.html#footnote-reference
      reagle on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/33737913)