0xFast

Infrastructure

blockchain data api

SHOW HN2022

63points
68comments
#840of 2,570 in 2022
Top 33%of 2022 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

6 positive, 11 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 20 critical, out of 38 comments about the project. Thread score -0.30.

Idea: 2 for, 7 againstDocs: 0 for, 4 againstPricing: 1 for, 3 againstPerformance: 1 for, 2 againstDesign: 0 for, 2 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Drop-in compatible with Geth JSON-RPC and useful for blockchain data access

    From 2 comments
    • This seems to implement the same JSON RPC interface as Geth, so it should be a drop in replacement RPC. I wonder how you are thinking about potential customers here? I wonder…
      joshuakelly on HN
    • I have played around. I love it! At 23gate.com we are not yet running our nodes for chainId=0x01, so I would love to switch our downloader to 0xfast. However it seems that there…
      egorfine on HN
  • Interesting speedups; commenter would like a technical write-up

    From 1 comment
    • I agree that the product itself seems like a nicer way to access web3 stuff! And I'd actually be interested in some blog posts about how the authors got such dramatic speedups.
      com2kid on HN

Objections

  • Web3 branding is off-putting and vague

    From 3 comments
    • The main page and the description is in a strange meme format, that creates a strawman Web2 Databases (cringe) and then argues that Web3 (but what is it?) is better without any…
      FeistySkink on HN
    • "Web3 data" means nothing. If you're referring to blockchain data, say blockchain data. "Web3" doesn't lend anything to technical conversations and is best used on board rooms…
      acaloiar on HN
    • No matter how great the product, but if the pitch includes any Web version number, we won't make friends.
      marban on HN
  • Claims of superiority over traditional databases are overstated; it resembles Postgres plus Elasticsearch

    From 2 comments
    • This is what the website literally claims: === start quote === Web2 Databases were meant to deal with datasets that change frequently. They have to provide ACID guarantees to…
      dmitriid on HN
    • > And I'd actually be interested in some blog posts about how the authors got such dramatic speedups. You did mention Kafka. They got the speed ups exactly how you get views from…
      dmitriid on HN
  • Pricing appears high relative to cloud bandwidth costs

    From 2 comments
    • No sure what the purpose of this really is. But the pricing seems bizzare. Hetzner cloud costs 1€ per extra TB (20 included) while this costs 2$ per Gb. That is an order of…
      LordHeini on HN
    • At least they clearly say they will charge you around 200x more than what you pay in the Web2 world for data transfer.
      IMTDb on HN
  • Benchmark metrics (latency, QPS) appear to measure network rather than service

    From 1 comment
    • It doesn't seem that it's the correct metrics, none of them makes much sense. Something is definitely wrong with the "Queries per second", it doesn't look like something…
      splix on HN

Requests

  • Technical details and architecture write-up

    From 2 comments
    • I agree that the product itself seems like a nicer way to access web3 stuff! And I'd actually be interested in some blog posts about how the authors got such dramatic speedups.
      com2kid on HN
    • This seems to implement the same JSON RPC interface as Geth, so it should be a drop in replacement RPC. I wonder how you are thinking about potential customers here? I wonder…
      joshuakelly on HN
  • Docs for connecting to Goerli versus mainnet

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • What are the cons compared with Alchemy?

    From 1 comment
  • Does it give fast access to full history?

    From 1 comment
    • > So, Apache Kafka. Does that give access to the full history quickly? > Edit: as anyone who actually does this for a living: you never use the append-only log as your source of…
      IanCal on HN

Alternatives named

  • Alchemy

    From 1 comment
  • Apache Kafka

    From 2 comments
    • > The only thing relevant here is that blockchain data is almost exclusively append-only So, Apache Kafka. Edit: as anyone who actually does this for a living: you never use the…
      dmitriid on HN
    • > So, Apache Kafka. Does that give access to the full history quickly? > Edit: as anyone who actually does this for a living: you never use the append-only log as your source of…
      IanCal on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/33908954)