Continue

Dev tools

ai coding assistant

SHOW HN2023

298points
103comments
#147of 3,109 in 2023
Top 5%of 2023 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

11 positive, 20 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 12 critical, out of 44 comments about the project. Thread score -0.08.

Privacy: 2 for, 6 againstIdea: 2 for, 2 againstDesign: 2 for, 1 againstExecution: 1 for, 2 againstPricing: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Clean UX that avoids copy/paste and gives precise highlight-based context

    From 2 comments
    • This looks great! I’ve been pretty underwhelmed with the UX of the other VS Code extensions, for just the reasons you list. This looks a lot like how I imagined an AI extension…
      dimal on HN
    • Been using Continue for a few weeks in combination with GH co-pilot. Overall it's been a solid experience. After a few days of adjusting, it's become my go to because I don't…
      jierlich on HN
  • Open source with support for local and open models

    From 2 comments
    • Looks like this is similar to GitHub Copilot Chat [0], just open source right? I like that you're supporting open models as well rather than just ChatGPT. Is there a way for your…
      satvikpendem on HN
    • Hey. I gave it a try to Continue and I think this is going in the right direction at least for me. I guess opinions on how this should work are subjective. But I do really like…
      whoisjuan on HN

Objections

  • Initially sent data to telemetry and third-party services without clear consent, since removed

    From 2 comments
    • A cursory look through the source reveals the presence of three different telemetry suites of which only Posthog looks to be properly documented. I could have overlooked it, but…
      krono on HN
    • Looks like it's trying to send my data to "meilisearch" without asking me :/
      smcleod on HN
  • Unclear which model and key are used and what the free tier covers

    From 2 comments
    • Hey! Thanks for this tool. I was testing and paying copilot, including the new chat integrated tool, but I feel your work flow proposal is more compelling. That said, I'm not…
      rodrigodlu on HN
    • I don't find this clear in the website what LLM it is really using. Is it sending my code and queries over the internet? Or can it use a local language model?
      jenadine on HN
  • Monetization via an external API could be risky

    From 1 comment
    • How are you going to monetize this? I would be very nervous building a business around an extension calling someone elses API. You only have to look at the drama that played out…
      jossclimb on HN

Requests

  • Support for JetBrains IDEs

    From 2 comments
    • Any plans for supporting Jetbrains IDEs?
      nraf on HN
    • Are you planning to support any other editors any time soon?
      mijoharas on HN
  • Automatic related-definition context from the language server

    From 1 comment
    • In my experience working with GPT4, if I give enough context on types, other functions definitions and the libraries I use, I get very accurate results. But it is a tedious task…
      milani on HN
  • Read terminal output and web pages as context

    From 2 comments
    • Is there any LLM based coding assistant than can read from terminal, thus catching error output?
      pax on HN
    • Thank you for supporting an open source ecosystem. A couple of thoughts. 1. It would be nice if we could ingest external resources like web pages. 2. Deep integration with the…
      FloatArtifact on HN

Questions

  • Which local models perform well

    From 1 comment
    • "Continue works with any LLM, including local models using ggml" Which of the local models have you seen the best results with? UPDATE: Found a note here…
      simonw on HN
  • Whether it works without GPT-4 for cost reasons

    From 1 comment

Alternatives named

  • GitHub Copilot and Copilot Chat

    From 2 comments
    • Focusing on VS Code for at least the next few weeks, but we've planned from the start! You can read more here (https://continue.dev/docs/how-continue-works), but the Continue…
      sestinj on HN
    • Looks like this is similar to GitHub Copilot Chat [0], just open source right? I like that you're supporting open models as well rather than just ChatGPT. Is there a way for your…
      satvikpendem on HN
  • Rubberduck VS Code extension

    From 1 comment
    • Check out the Rubberduck Extension [1] for VS Code. It's not super well publicized but I've actually found it basically hits a perfect middle ground between copilot and…
      extr on HN
  • Aider

    From 1 comment
    • This looks really interesting. Have you spent much time investigating how to provide code context to the LLM without needing to manually highlight all the relevant code? That’s…
      anotherpaulg on HN
  • Cody

    From 1 comment
    • Why is nobody in this space making good gains on UX? I have tried almost every co-pilot solution, including GitHub Co-Pilot with Chat and Labs, Cody, and a few random extensions.…
      whoisjuan on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/36882146)