WireHub

Infrastructure

wireguard config management

SHOW HN2023

312points
72comments
#138of 3,109 in 2023
Top 5%of 2023 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

8 positive, 13 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 11 critical, out of 32 comments about the project. Thread score -0.04.

Idea: 2 for, 4 againstPrivacy: 3 for, 1 againstDocs: 1 for, 3 againstExecution: 0 for, 2 againstDesign: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful for business and self-hosted WireGuard setups

    From 2 comments
    • OOh -- this sounds actually potentially awesome for business use-cases. Tailscale is the commercial tool to help setup and manage wireguard networks, and it had a big security…
      mushufasa on HN
    • This looks useful, I'll give it a try when I have the need next time. What are your aspirations for it by the way? Are you looking to monetize it?
      ValtteriL on HN
  • Good balance of convenience and security versus Tailscale

    From 2 comments
    • TLDR: WireHub is a tool that helps you generate WireGuard configurations and easily share those with your end-users - instead of emailing configs around, you can just share a…
      rudasn on HN
    • Thanks! :) So, WireHub is basically a wireguard config generator. A tool to generate some text files. What you do with those files is up to you. Because getting from text files…
      rudasn on HN

Objections

  • Single-config generator is compared unfavourably with self-hosted or all-in-one tools

    From 2 comments
    • This looks incredibly similar to wg-easy, which I see you have cloned in your github repo as well. Is this simply a SaaS-y frontend to wg-easy, or something different all together?
      mdekkers on HN
    • This looks interesting. I’m currently evaluating my options of just giving in to Tailscale or trying to replicate it with plain Wireguard… or something like you’ve built. One…
      karolist on HN
  • Gitlab single sign-on did not work reliably

    From 2 comments
    • Hi, nice project. The Single Sign On using Gitlab does not work
      leonixyz on HN
    • Hey, could you please try again? I created a new gitlab app, maybe that was the issue. On my end, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Not getting any errors though which is…
      rudasn on HN
  • No way to remove a network or device yet

    From 2 comments

Requests

  • Connect networks together

    From 1 comment
    • I'd add a way to connect networks together so you can have devices see each other on the respective networks!
      dangoodmanUT on HN
  • IPv6 support

    From 1 comment
  • Dynamic node support via API

    From 1 comment
    • great idea to reduce scope and skip "the agent" part and let the users do it, can be added later. When you do, you probably want to introduce some means to query for and update…
      flas9sd on HN

Questions

  • How private keys are handled and whether the site can see them

    From 2 comments
    • OOh -- this sounds actually potentially awesome for business use-cases. Tailscale is the commercial tool to help setup and manage wireguard networks, and it had a big security…
      mushufasa on HN
    • Trust, or no trust, since it's all in the browser you can check for yourself what gets posted to WireHub when you submit the form containing your private key :) Quick edit: you…
      rudasn on HN
  • Whether it is open source

    From 1 comment
    • OOh -- this sounds actually potentially awesome for business use-cases. Tailscale is the commercial tool to help setup and manage wireguard networks, and it had a big security…
      mushufasa on HN
  • Whether MagicDNS can be replicated

    From 1 comment
    • This looks interesting. I’m currently evaluating my options of just giving in to Tailscale or trying to replicate it with plain Wireguard… or something like you’ve built. One…
      karolist on HN

Alternatives named

  • Tailscale

    From 1 comment
    • OOh -- this sounds actually potentially awesome for business use-cases. Tailscale is the commercial tool to help setup and manage wireguard networks, and it had a big security…
      mushufasa on HN
  • Headscale

    From 1 comment
  • wg-easy

    From 1 comment
    • This looks incredibly similar to wg-easy, which I see you have cloned in your github repo as well. Is this simply a SaaS-y frontend to wg-easy, or something different all together?
      mdekkers on HN
  • Netbird

    From 1 comment
    • It is always great to see another solution using Wireguard, which is a great technology for modern private connectivity. I built https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird, which can…
      m_santos on HN
  • Netmaker

    From 1 comment
    • The question is what about the security of such a solution compared to the self-hosted version of https://www.netmaker.io/.
      kszyh on HN
  • ZeroTier

    From 1 comment
    • this reminds me of zerotier. however i confess i don’t know a lot of how it works under the hood. what is the main difference of this with zerotier in terms of potential use…
      mmasu on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/38155544)