GrafyChat

AI

chat interface

SHOW HN2024

459points
130comments
#80of 3,515 in 2024
Top 3%of 2024 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

28 positive, 22 neutral or asking, 6 mixed, 16 critical, out of 72 comments about the project. Thread score +0.23.

Idea: 16 for, 5 againstPricing: 5 for, 2 againstDesign: 2 for, 2 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 4 againstPerformance: 0 for, 2 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Bring-your-own-key approach and no subscription model

    From 3 comments
    • The only feedback I would give is I'm suspicious of (will not buy) closed sourced AI anything. With that said: thank you for sloughing off the subscription model trend! That is…
      altruios on HN
    • Curious why you settled on the BYOAK approach rather than a subscription approach
      iknownthing on HN
    • This is great. More importantly - I love the pricing!!
      nirav72 on HN
  • Canvas and tree visualization of chats is a useful idea

    From 3 comments
    • Sometime ago I had an idea for a similar interface without the dragging feature. Basically, just a tree visualisation. I usually discuss a tangent topic in the same conversation,…
      carlosbaraza on HN
    • Very cool! I built a version of this [1], but balked at trying to sell it. This is the third iteration of this idea I've seen so far. Your reply popup is a smart feature and a…
      joshuahutt on HN
    • I built a similar demo to this but for images - IMO this is a much better structure for working with LLMs as it allows you to really riff with a machine instead of feeling like…
      kkukshtel on HN
  • Clean design and landing page

    From 2 comments
    • Good landing page, explained to me the product well enough. I like your concept also as i wished sometimes for something similiar in the past.
      siva7 on HN
    • Excellent UI! I love it.
      subhashp on HN

Objections

  • Closed source, so no way to verify privacy or telemetry

    From 2 comments
    • The only feedback I would give is I'm suspicious of (will not buy) closed sourced AI anything. With that said: thank you for sloughing off the subscription model trend! That is…
      altruios on HN
    • It seems to work well but a desktop app (or self hosted) is essential. I can't paste in valuable API keys to a third party website.
      teruakohatu on HN
  • Pricing is high for some users

    From 1 comment
    • I like this and wished openai or anthropic enabled similar in their UIs... it would be simple actually: "create a new chat from here" Otherwise, great job! It's cool, but it's…
      ramoz on HN
  • Too complex compared with simple ask-and-answer

    From 1 comment
    • This is interesting and all, but it's a tad complex to use. AI is supposed to simplify your life, but this just ends up making things more complicated. Ask -> answer, no more…
      shanghaikid on HN

Requests

  • Open source the app or its documentation

    From 3 comments
    • The only feedback I would give is I'm suspicious of (will not buy) closed sourced AI anything. With that said: thank you for sloughing off the subscription model trend! That is…
      altruios on HN
    • Congrats on the launch. I'll take a closer look soon and only played around a bit. Would be great if you could extend the documentation. If you're not open sourcing the app, what…
      seedie on HN
    • Do you plan to open source it? I will love to extend it. I had similar ideas about non linear UI.
      raxrb on HN
  • Desktop app or self-hosting

    From 1 comment
    • It seems to work well but a desktop app (or self hosted) is essential. I can't paste in valuable API keys to a third party website.
      teruakohatu on HN
  • Mobile support

    From 2 comments
    • Hard to try it on my phone.
      p1esk on HN
    • Congrats on the launch! I love that you let ppl try it without even signing up! The mobile experience needs to work tho.
      noashavit on HN
  • RAG over user files and data

    From 1 comment
    • It looks like you put a lot of work into this but node based workflows are ok when they're a necessary evil and just an evil otherwise. I'd be more interested in a tool where I…
      CuriouslyC on HN

Questions

  • Can it be self-hosted for a team, and how are licenses counted

    From 1 comment
    • Didn't find it in the documentation. How would I go about if I want to self-host it for a small team of like 14 people? Should I buy licenses for 14 (3x extended) instances, or 1…
      tomfreemax on HN
  • What the tech stack is

    From 1 comment
    • Can you share details of the technology stack used to build the tool?
      brunoborges on HN

Alternatives named

  • Obsidian Canvas with plugins

    From 2 comments
    • You can create something like this easily by yourself using Obsidian and a plugin like https://github.com/AndreBaltazar8/obsidian-canvas-conversation
      Hrun0 on HN
    • You can get almost the same results for free using Obsidian Canvas and one of the following plugins: - https://github.com/MetaCorp/obsidian-augmented-canvas -…
      niutech on HN
  • Gingko

    From 1 comment
    • Interesting take! It does seem to address a typical "intermediate" workflow; even though we prefer linear finished products, we often work by completing a hierarchy first. I've…
      btbuildem on HN
  • gptel in Emacs

    From 1 comment
    • For a text based version of the "tree of chats" idea, using Emacs, Org mode and gptel see `gptel-org-branching-context`in:…
      yaantc on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/40300126)