Joosy

Languages and libraries

javascript framework

SHOW HN2012

91points
35comments
#247of 1,677 in 2012
Top 15%of 2012 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

9 positive, 1 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 8 critical, out of 20 comments about the project. Thread score -0.03.

Idea: 2 for, 4 againstDocs: 3 for, 2 againstDesign: 2 for, 1 againstPerformance: 1 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Clean and simple, close to Rails philosophy

    From 2 comments
    • On a completely different note, I think this looks fantastic. There are so many javascript frameworks out there but none of them have really approached the cleanliness and…
      jenius on HN
    • Wow - this looks really awesome. The ability to use haml is a nice touch too.
      rjsamson on HN
  • Well documented with in-depth guides

    From 2 comments
    • I didn't have the time to study the project in depth, but it looks very promising, well documented, and it also looks like an approach that I was looking for in other frameworks.…
      danmaz74 on HN
    • Congratulations on this. I love the idea of tying the back end and front end. I can't see a reason not to integrate with Rails! And it is awesome that you have the in depth…
      amalag on HN
  • Tight integration with Rails

    From 2 comments
    • I dig this. I've been using Ember + Rails and it still feels like client-side frameworks are reinventing a lot of server-side wheels because you still need a server-side layer…
      MattRogish on HN
    • I agree - none of the other frameworks I've tried have felt right, but this looks like a great fit with Rails - we'll see if I feel the same way after using it though :)
      rjsamson on HN

Objections

  • Bundles Sugar.js, seen as bloated

    From 2 comments
    • I can't get past this (let alone the why of another MV*) - Why sugar.js? 6731 lines of bloat. This is going to turn off a great number of developers out the gates.
      sic1 on HN
    • I'm obviously opinionated on this point (backbone/underscore user), it just seems like it comes with so much i wont ever user - and could easily add via a mixin on a per project…
      sic1 on HN
  • Lacks two-way data binding

    From 1 comment
    • Joosy seems to be missing real 2-way data binding of Angularjs/Knockout.js/Serenade.js/Batman.js, even if it can automatically re-render views. Looks like it still keeps the…
      gregwebs on HN
  • Reusing JavaScript code on other platforms like Node.js is hard

    From 2 comments
    • What the fuck is going to happen when I need to reuse my JavaScript code on a different platform e.g NodeJS, vert.x etc? I'm sorry for negative comments but, what ruby and .net…
      combataircraft on HN
    • All the JavaScript and templating code should be reusable by other platforms with no effort. It's required for testing, optimization and being able to move from one technology to…
      combataircraft on HN

Requests

  • Add a 'todo list in 10 minutes' video to the homepage

    From 1 comment
    • I didn't have the time to study the project in depth, but it looks very promising, well documented, and it also looks like an approach that I was looking for in other frameworks.…
      danmaz74 on HN
  • Support for Slim templates

    From 1 comment
    • Congratulations on this. I love the idea of tying the back end and front end. I can't see a reason not to integrate with Rails! And it is awesome that you have the in depth…
      amalag on HN

Questions

  • Why Sugar.js instead of Underscore

    From 1 comment
    • I can't get past this (let alone the why of another MV*) - Why sugar.js? 6731 lines of bloat. This is going to turn off a great number of developers out the gates.
      sic1 on HN
  • Can it be used with Node.js

    From 2 comments
    • What the fuck is going to happen when I need to reuse my JavaScript code on a different platform e.g NodeJS, vert.x etc? I'm sorry for negative comments but, what ruby and .net…
      combataircraft on HN
    • You just take it and use it. Joosy doesn't make to write you code in some special way (except CoffeeScript but it can be used with node.js). What's for binding parts (pages,…
      inossidabile on HN

Alternatives named

  • Ember

    From 2 comments
    • I dig this. I've been using Ember + Rails and it still feels like client-side frameworks are reinventing a lot of server-side wheels because you still need a server-side layer…
      MattRogish on HN
    • Take Ember for example. Joosy is only 2-3kb more including Sugar. Compare the profit. One framework can not (and should never try to) address everything. Sugar beats Underscore…
      inossidabile on HN
  • Angular.js

    From 1 comment
    • Joosy seems to be missing real 2-way data binding of Angularjs/Knockout.js/Serenade.js/Batman.js, even if it can automatically re-render views. Looks like it still keeps the…
      gregwebs on HN
  • Knockout.js

    From 1 comment
    • Joosy seems to be missing real 2-way data binding of Angularjs/Knockout.js/Serenade.js/Batman.js, even if it can automatically re-render views. Looks like it still keeps the…
      gregwebs on HN
  • Backbone

    From 1 comment
    • I'm obviously opinionated on this point (backbone/underscore user), it just seems like it comes with so much i wont ever user - and could easily add via a mixin on a per project…
      sic1 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/4064462)