Voynich NLP analysis

Learning and science

linguistics research

SHOW HN2025

381points
132comments
#124of 3,837 in 2025
Top 4%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

5 positive, 17 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 5 critical, out of 28 comments about the project. Thread score 0.00.

Idea: 3 for, 4 againstExecution: 1 for, 1 againstDocs: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Interesting, nerdy deep-dive into the Voynich

    From 1 comment
    • This is hands-down the nerdiest and coolest deep-dive into the Voynich I’ve seen.
      pawanjswal on HN
  • Fascinating approach to an unsolved puzzle

    From 1 comment
    • Voynich is one of my favorite unsolved puzzles. This approach looks fascinating, so thanks for sharing your work here!
      thearn4 on HN

Objections

  • Embedding model is outdated and may not suit an unknown language

    From 1 comment
    • A point of note is that the text embeddings model used here is paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2…
      minimaxir on HN
  • Stripping suffixes removes information and may harm results

    From 2 comments
    • A point of note is that the text embeddings model used here is paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2…
      minimaxir on HN
    • This is very interesting. You should post a link to https://www.voynich.ninja/index.php I'm not familiar with SBERT, or with modern statistical NLP in general, but SBERT works on…
      DonaldFisk on HN
  • Trained-on-known-languages models cannot extract meaning from an unknown script

    From 1 comment
    • I feel like we are missing an important point...the transformer model that has been used here is trained on known languages. This means it cannot extract meaningful embeddings…
      theRealEros on HN
  • Manuscript is likely a hoax or gibberish

    From 2 comments
    • I strongly believe the manuscript is undecipherable in the sense thats it's all gibberish. I can't prove it, but at this point I think it's more likely than not to be hoax.
      glimshe on HN
    • theres no need to do any of this, its fake, its a forgery
      mach5 on HN

Requests

  • Try UMAP or t-SNE instead of PCA

    From 1 comment
    • UMAP or TSNE would be nice, even if PCA already shows nice separation. Reference mapping each cluster to all the others would be a nice way to indicate that there's no…
      tetris11 on HN
  • Run a control test on known or meaningless text

    From 2 comments
    • (I know nothing about NLP) Does it make sense to check the process with a control group? E.g. if we ask a human to write something that resembles a language but isn’t, then…
      thih9 on HN
    • This is very interesting. You should post a link to https://www.voynich.ninja/index.php I'm not familiar with SBERT, or with modern statistical NLP in general, but SBERT works on…
      DonaldFisk on HN
  • Try newer embedding models or keep suffixes

    From 2 comments
    • A point of note is that the text embeddings model used here is paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2…
      minimaxir on HN
    • Sorry if I missed it, but what about keeping the suffixes and trying to do some finetuning on the source then clustering sentences or at least pages which given the media should…
      gthompson512 on HN

Questions

  • Was the write-up link broken

    From 1 comment
    • The link to the write-up seems broken, can you write the correct one?
      GTP on HN
  • Was the text processed left to right when stripping suffixes

    From 1 comment
    • This looks very interesting - nice work! I have no background in NLP or linguistics, but I do have a question about this: > I stripped a set of recurring suffix-like endings from…
      andyjohnson0 on HN
  • Has the manuscript already been deciphered

    From 1 comment
    • Wasn't it already deciphered, though? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368991190_The_Voynich_Manuscript_Decoded
      ablanton on HN

Alternatives named

  • Prior Voynich analyses by Zattera, Roe, Feaster and Coons

    From 1 comment
    • The best work on Voynich has been done by Emma Smith, Coons and Patrick Feaster, about loops and QOKEDAR and CHOLDAIIN cycles. Here's a good presentation:…
      veqq on HN
  • voynich.nu transcriptions and voynich.ninja forum

    From 2 comments
    • The best work on Voynich has been done by Emma Smith, Coons and Patrick Feaster, about loops and QOKEDAR and CHOLDAIIN cycles. Here's a good presentation:…
      veqq on HN
    • Although I skimmed the methodology out of curiosity, what really drew my eye was the transcription in the repository of the manuscript. This led me down a rabbit hole leading…
      andrewla on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/44022353)