Octelium

Security and privacy

zero trust access

SHOW HN2025

358points
151comments
#137of 3,837 in 2025
Top 4%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

8 positive, 23 neutral or asking, 4 mixed, 26 critical, out of 61 comments about the project. Thread score -0.27.

Docs: 4 for, 14 againstIdea: 2 for, 6 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 1 againstExecution: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Maker is responsive and open to technical feedback

    From 1 comment
    • You’re getting a lot of negative feedback but I think it’s mostly just people who don’t speak (or actively hate) enterprise jargon. Hacker News is not super enterprisey. Just…
      et1337 on HN

Objections

  • README and landing text are full of buzzwords and hard to understand

    From 3 comments
    • I have an immediate complete distrust to anything that throws around so many buzzwords. This is the github page and I still don't understand what it even does, specifically.
      mzhaase on HN
    • I'd appreciate if you could provide me a list of those buzzwords so that I can improve the readme.
      geoctl on HN
    • Believe me I am the one who's actually still struggling to find where the jargon/buzzwords/naming dropping exactly is in my own README. Is it terms such as ZTNA/BeyondCorp, MCP,…
      geoctl on HN
  • Unclear what the project actually does

    From 1 comment
    • I have an immediate complete distrust to anything that throws around so many buzzwords. This is the github page and I still don't understand what it even does, specifically.
      mzhaase on HN
  • Project was private until recently; initial commit history looks odd

    From 2 comments
    • Thank you for your insightful feedback. I completely understand the criticism because Octelium is conciously designed to be many things at the same time. As mentioned in the…
      geoctl on HN
    • I have been developing the project solo on a private GitHub repo since 2020. I am not VC-backed or whatever else, Octelium has been a solo effort so far basically. The project…
      geoctl on HN

Requests

  • Simplify the README and docs

    From 2 comments
    • I completely agree with you. And tbqh since almost everybody in the thread is complaining about the README then I must be really doing something wrong explaining Octelium and…
      geoctl on HN
    • Thank you, I will definitely add more kind of less-technical information on the homepage to make it easier to understand for business people. As for comparisons, I have been…
      geoctl on HN
  • Add comparisons with competing products

    From 1 comment
    • Thank you, I will definitely add more kind of less-technical information on the homepage to make it easier to understand for business people. As for comparisons, I have been…
      geoctl on HN

Questions

  • Whether it is peer-to-peer or hub-and-spoke

    From 2 comments
    • Looking at the docs, Octelium uses a hub-and-spoke model with Gateways acting as central routing points, unlike Tailscale's direct peer-to-peer mesh - this architectural…
      ethan_smith on HN
    • The big thing to me about Tailscale is easy p2p connectivity. I think it looks like this doesn't do that and uses centralized router(s)?
      yjftsjthsd-h on HN
  • Whether it replaces a simple VPN for connecting subnets

    From 2 comments
    • This is similar to the current set up I have with tailscale, but it's not ideal, hence why i asked.
      pydry on HN
    • Can I ask you what an ideal setup for your use case would look like? Octelium isn't really concerned with connecting complete remote subnets to each other directly. You can…
      geoctl on HN

Alternatives named

  • Cloudflare Access

    From 1 comment
  • Teleport

    From 1 comment
  • Tailscale

    From 1 comment
  • Pomerium

    From 1 comment
    • Quick note since it was mentioned. Pomerium does support Kubernetes at pretty much every level you mentioned (although I'm not entirely sure what a "a complete Kubernetes-tier…
      bdesimone on HN
  • StrongDM

    From 1 comment
    • You’re getting a lot of negative feedback but I think it’s mostly just people who don’t speak (or actively hate) enterprise jargon. Hacker News is not super enterprisey. Just…
      et1337 on HN
  • Nebula

    From 1 comment

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/44412207)