voil

Dev tools

vs code extension

SHOW HN2025

67points
46comments
#1,036of 3,837 in 2025
Top 28%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

1 positive, 7 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 8 critical, out of 17 comments about the project. Thread score -0.27.

Privacy: 0 for, 5 againstIdea: 0 for, 2 againstDesign: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Idea is cool and useful for text-editing users

    From 2 comments

Objections

  • Unverified publisher makes installing the extension a supply chain risk

    From 3 comments
    • This looks cool, but I'm a bit wary of publishers that aren't verified. > Do you trust the publisher "Ali Mostafavi"? > The extension voil is published by Ali Mostafavi. This is…
      gschizas on HN
    • > view the source code and package the extension yourself The problem is that nobody will do that. Even if it were 500 LOC. And this is why supply chain attacks are on the rise.
      4gotunameagain on HN
    • IMO you should avoid installing editor extensions generally. It's better to try to get them merged into the editor itself. I don't think it's good to constrain people in some way…
      msgodel on HN
  • Touch or terminal tools already do this faster

    From 2 comments
    • Falling to see why `touch newfile` doesn't accomplish this as fast if not faster and without yet another extension.
      dcreater on HN
    • If you need complex file manipulation, all of that can be achieved by writing a shell script. That's what I've been doing. You also automatically get access to flow control…
      homebrewer on HN
  • UI feels raw

    From 1 comment

Requests

  • Port the extension to Zed

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • Is there an equivalent for Zed

    From 2 comments
    • Is it possible to make an extension like that for Zed?
      SwiftyBug on HN
    • AFAIK not with their current extremely limited API, but it’s on their roadmap to have a more extendable editor.
      weakfish on HN

Alternatives named

  • oil.nvim

    From 1 comment
    • Some vim user too! oil.nvim is a pretty popular package that does this.
      heltale on HN
  • dired

    From 2 comments
    • hey that's just dired ! https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Dired.html
      signa11 on HN
    • I don't use emacs so I may not be familiar with the full power, but if you are referring to dired, I think oil.nvim is much, much more powerful than dired. The major difference…
      hexomancer on HN
  • vimv

    From 1 comment
    • See vimv (https://github.com/thameera/vimv) for a minimal version of this in the CLI, using Vim as the editor.
      lorenzohess on HN
  • vidir

    From 1 comment
    • Also vidir, which is in the moreutils package in popular distros.
      mjw1007 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/44548630)