Price Per Token

Well done. The UX is solid. Clean, intuitive, and the use of color makes everything instantly clear

"OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and more", where "and more" = 0. Where's Gemma, DeepSeek, etc? The UI, however, is really clean and straight to the point. I like the interface, but…

Is there a reason why you have not added DeepSeek and Qwen and Meta ? You should also aggregate prices from Vertex and AWS Bedrock .

Seems odd to not have r1, qwen etc, groq, etc

Mistral is missing

But the data is... wrong? Google Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10/mtok input [1] but is shown here as $0.40/mtok? [1]…

The input is wrong tho Your website reports 0.30$ for input and that wouldn't make any sense as it would be priced the same as the bigger Flash model.

Main issue is that token are not equivalent across provider / models. With huge disparity inside provider beyond the tokenizer model: - An image will take 10x token on…

Maybe I am blinded by my own use case, but I find the caching pricing and strategy (since different providers use a different implementation of caching as well as different…

KV caching is priced and managed quite differently between providers as well. Seeing as it becomes a huge chunk of the actual tokens used, wondering if there's an easy way to…

(I work at OpenRouter) We have solved this problem by working with the providers to implement a prices and models API that we scrape, which is how we keep our marketplace up to…

It would be fun to compare with inference providers (groq/vertex ai, etc.).

Is there a reason why you have not added DeepSeek and Qwen and Meta ? You should also aggregate prices from Vertex and AWS Bedrock .

yes going to add that

I wanted to gauge interest before adding 500 models I plan on adding cache prices and making the list more comprehensive

Nice! It will be good to also pull in leaderboard rankings and/or benchmarks for each of these models, so we understand capability perhaps from lmsys (not sure if there is a…

I'd love to see this data joined with common benchmarks, in order to see which models get you the most "bang for your buck", i.e. benchmark score / token cost

This is awesome! I wonder how possible it is to incorporate benchmarks - maybe as a filter? Since not all tokens are as useful as others. Heh.

Can you gather historical information as well? I did a bit of spelunking of the Wayback Machine to gather a partial dataset for OpenAI, but mine is incomplete. Future planning is…

Cool site. Would be interesting to add a time dimension to track prices over time

Nice! Missing a cost calculator with input and output fields.

> The only place I am aware of is going to these provider's individual website pages to check the price per token. Openrouter is a good alternative. Added bonus that you can also…

There was a time when it was unbelievably frustrating to navigate the bunch of marketing pages required to find the cost of a newly announced model, now I just look at OpenRouter…

(I work at OpenRouter) We have a simple model comparison tool that is not-at-all-obvious to find on the website, but hopefully can help somewhat. E.g.…

surprising that you didn't find any of the existing ones, including our own simonw's: https://www.llm-prices.com

Site is down as I type this, but a shout-out to Simon Willison's LLM pricing calculator: https://www.llm-prices.com/

Nice. I think I prefer https://models.dev/ as it seems more complete

There’s also this: https://models.dev/

there's also http://llmprices.dev. similar, but with a searchbox for quick filtering

This is great, but as others have mentioned the UX problem is more complicated than this: - for other models there are providers that serve the same model with different prices -…