Mcp-use

Dev tools

mcp client library

SHOW HN2025

155points
74comments
#469of 3,837 in 2025
Top 13%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

15 positive, 10 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 4 critical, out of 29 comments about the project. Thread score +0.25.

Idea: 8 for, 2 againstExecution: 5 for, 1 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Far less boilerplate than the official SDK; easy to use

    From 3 comments
    • Really great work! We’ve been integrating LLMs into production chat-based workflows for a while, and mcp-use has given us the biggest DX boost we’ve seen all year. It strips away…
      jellothere on HN
    • I have used mcp-use to write some demo functionality and it is very easy to use and works great!
      jonfw on HN
    • Thank you for sharing this! At Product Weaver we love how mcp-use makes our life easier when accessing MCP servers like Jira, Linear, Notion and many others. We like the clean…
      kenlo on HN
  • Server manager with meta-tools reduces context flooding

    From 2 comments
    • neat idea and exec. With the # of MCPs exploding, I assume there will be different MCPs offering similar services, and selecting the "right" one will require more time for the…
      miotts on HN
    • Love this! Finally someone breaking open the MCP ecosystem for real dev use. mcp-use looks like the right balance between power and simplicity. The agent abstraction + tool…
      cap_andrea on HN

Objections

  • Agent is a thin wrapper over LangChain AgentExecutor, not production-ready

    From 2 comments
    • I get the client part, great job! However, the agent is really just a wrapper of Langchain AgentExecutor. This doesn't seem like something someone would want to put into…
      zwaps on HN
    • Huge variety of problems with this for mid-market or enterprise use. This is basically a toy right now and can’t be used for solving repeatable, valuable problems for actual…
      saberience on HN
  • Security and observability concerns with connecting to arbitrary MCP servers

    From 2 comments
    • Huge variety of problems with this for mid-market or enterprise use. This is basically a toy right now and can’t be used for solving repeatable, valuable problems for actual…
      saberience on HN
    • How does the sandboxing work? Is it cross platform? Options for filesystem/netork?
      scosman on HN
  • Dependence on LangChain

    From 1 comment
    • Huge variety of problems with this for mid-market or enterprise use. This is basically a toy right now and can’t be used for solving repeatable, valuable problems for actual…
      saberience on HN

Requests

  • Structured error handling so LLMs can decide to retry

    From 1 comment
    • The prod-readiness concerns are fair, but mcp-use fills a real gap in the MCP stack: orchestration across many servers with far less boilerplate than the official SDK. Even if…
      farkin88 on HN
  • Better client documentation with examples of using the client without the agent

    From 1 comment
    • I'm confused -- I didn't see a single example in you readme or docs that uses the client WITHOUT your agent. Trying to understand if this is an alternative to FastMCP. I don't…
      redhale on HN
  • Local sandboxed execution alternative to E2B

    From 1 comment
    • > MCP-Use supports running MCP servers in a sandboxed environment using E2B's cloud infrastructure. If you want to support a local and privacy friendly sandboxed environment for…
      mkagenius on HN

Questions

  • How the sandboxing works and whether it is cross platform

    From 1 comment
    • How does the sandboxing work? Is it cross platform? Options for filesystem/netork?
      scosman on HN
  • Why use this instead of the official SDK or FastMCP client

    From 2 comments
    • Hey, this is really cool. But why should I use this and not the official SDK?
      alepeak on HN
    • Great idea! Definitely going to use it. What are some good reasons to prefer this over fastmcp clients? https://gofastmcp.com/clients/client
      preem_palver on HN
  • How resources and prompts are handled, not just tools

    From 1 comment
    • Good, I have not dig into the code, just one question: how to deal with other stuff supplied by MCP server, I mean besides tools, server also supplied "resources", "prompt" and…
      pengli1707 on HN

Alternatives named

  • FastMCP client

    From 2 comments
    • Great idea! Definitely going to use it. What are some good reasons to prefer this over fastmcp clients? https://gofastmcp.com/clients/client
      preem_palver on HN
    • Hey, thanks! Please let us know if we can help with anything once you get started. FastMCP is very good at servers, they just recently started to provide a client. The client is…
      pzullo on HN
  • Official MCP SDK

    From 1 comment
    • Hey, this is really cool. But why should I use this and not the official SDK?
      alepeak on HN
  • Langroid MCP adaptor

    From 1 comment
    • For what it’s worth, several months ago, in Langroid (an agent framework that works with any LLM) we added an adaptor using FastMCP that translates between Langroid’s Tools and…
      d4rkp4ttern on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/44747229)