Yolobox

Dev tools

sandboxing for ai coding agents

SHOW HN2026

122points
99comments
#539of 4,366 in 2026
Top 13%of 2026 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

6 positive, 21 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 8 critical, out of 35 comments about the project. Thread score -0.02.

Idea: 5 for, 4 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 3 againstDocs: 1 for, 0 againstDesign: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful idea that fills a need for safer agent execution.

    From 2 comments
    • Nice. I love that the community as a whole is exploring all these different methods of containing undesirable side effects from using coding agents. This seems to lean towards…
      akurilin on HN
    • I was talking to ChatGPT about the best way to achieve this a few days ago. Thanks for getting something running and sharing it! I'll give this a try tomorrow, should be fun.
      jcjmcclean on HN

Objections

  • Containers are not a robust isolation boundary; a VM is safer.

    From 2 comments
    • Containers are not a robust way to isolate untrusted programs. A lightweight VM is probably the best balance between usability and security. They are effective at fostering a…
      catlifeonmars on HN
    • From “How it works” in the readme: > yolobox uses container isolation (Docker or Podman) as its security boundary… I have no issue with running agents in containers FWIW, just in…
      catlifeonmars on HN
  • Current directory mounted read-write and config file mounts can enable escape.

    From 1 comment
    • Ok that was super fun. Gemini managed to break out: I just redteamed this. The security model relies on the container boundary, but it implicitly trusts local configuration…
      Finbarr on HN
  • Running agents locally is risky; a remote VM may be better.

    From 2 comments
    • Is there a reason for wanting to run these agents on your own local machine, instead of just spinning up a VPS and scp'ing whatever specific files you want them to review, and…
      forgingahead on HN
    • An alternative might be to run the agent in a VM in the cloud and use Syncthing or some other tool like that to move files back and forth. (I'm using exe.dev for the VM.)
      skybrian on HN

Requests

  • Support for connecting to other docker containers from inside the sandbox.

    From 2 comments
    • I do (most of) my development in docker containers. Usually a project will have a docker compose with web server, database etc. How can I use this so the yolobox container can…
      gingerlime on HN
    • This is a good question and something I explored a little. I’ll need to do further research and come back on what the best option is. There’s a way to give a docker container…
      Finbarr on HN
  • Documentation explaining the trust model.

    From 1 comment
    • Thanks for sharing this! I've been experimenting with something similar. It would be helpful if the README explained how this works so users understand what they're trusting to…
      mtlynch on HN
  • Option to disable yolo mode.

    From 1 comment
    • great but can the yolo modes be disabled? I want only the isolation
      rogeliodh on HN

Questions

  • How does it compare to devcontainers and built-in agent sandboxing?

    From 2 comments
    • How would this compare with e.g. the .devcontainer docker files that AI coding companies like Claude Code provide already setup?
      canadiantim on HN
    • There is a lot of chatter on Twitter and here about sandboxes for AI, however there appears to be a lack of awareness of the native built in sandboxing capabilities of Claude…
      moderation on HN
  • Does it support rootless Podman or Podman machines?

    From 1 comment
    • Thanks for sharing this! I've been experimenting with something similar. It would be helpful if the README explained how this works so users understand what they're trusting to…
      mtlynch on HN

Alternatives named

  • Litterbox (Podman, Wayland socket support)

    From 1 comment
    • Very cool! I've recently built something similar at https://github.com/Gerharddc/litterbox (https://litterbox.work/). Litterbox only works on Linux as it heavily relies on…
      Gerharddc on HN
  • shai (read-only mounts, network restriction)

    From 1 comment
    • Checkout https://github.com/colony-2/shai It runs locally. You can control which directories it has read / write access. You can control network traffic too.
      LayeredDelay on HN
  • Bubblewrap scripts

    From 1 comment
    • I always thought Docker/Podman is a bit overkill for this kind of thing. On Linux all you need is Bubblewrap. I did this as soon as I downloaded Claude Code as there was no way I…
      globular-toast on HN
  • Devcontainers

    From 2 comments
    • How would this compare with e.g. the .devcontainer docker files that AI coding companies like Claude Code provide already setup?
      canadiantim on HN
    • This is basically a devcontainer, right?
      woodson on HN
  • Distrobox and Toolbx

    From 1 comment
    • how about https://containertoolbx.org/ ? or https://github.com/89luca89/distrobox ?
      lazylizard on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/46592344)