git-ai

I think the special feature is that it tracks on a per line basis in a blended commit what AI is doing vs. whole commits. not sure the utility of it.

It’s not in the git commit history, that’s the cool part! Git-ai stores it in git notes, easy to remove later if you don’t like it ;)

I'm not sold at the idea - for most projects it makes sense that the author of the PR should ultimately have ownership in the code that they're submitting. It doesn't matter if…

Why!? What possible benefit is there to stuffing my git commit history with this noise?

I doubt anyone is going to really use it for that purpose. What's more likely is people nitpicking or harassing pr authors over any use of AI.

Why not just look at the code and see if it's good or not?

> Projects like Zig may never allow ai contributions Good luck enforcing that. This extension is solving for the wrong problem and is actually only useful as some kind of…

Wouldn't the thing to do to give them their own account id / email so we can use standard git blame tools? Why do we need a plugin or new tools to accomplish this? Don't know why…

It seems like something like this should be added to the commit object/message itself, instead of git notes. Maybe as addition to Co-Authored-By trailer. This would make sure…

Giving it its own id doesn't store all the useful metadata this tool preserves, like the model and prompt that generated the code

Because they can produce magnitude more code than you can review. And personally I don't want to review _any_ submitted AI code if I don't have a guarantee that the person who…

Wouldn't the thing to do to give them their own account id / email so we can use standard git blame tools? Why do we need a plugin or new tools to accomplish this? Don't know why…

Many posts get resubmitted if someone finds them interesting and, if it's been a few days, they generally get "second-chance" treatment. That means they'll be able to make it to…

That would cost a seat, I'm guessing.

how much is this solution like this going to cost you per current seat? On one hand, I would imagine companies like GitHub will not charge for agent accounts because they want to…

I think this is what aider/cecli does

I believe GitLens has a version of this feature that I tried. To others points, seeing the person who actually committed it was more helpful.

Wouldn't the thing to do to give them their own account id / email so we can use standard git blame tools? Why do we need a plugin or new tools to accomplish this? Don't know why…

I'm using '(human)' and '(agent)' prefix as a poor mans alternative