explainers

Learning and science

interactive explainers

SHOW HN2026

43points
30comments
#1,341of 4,366 in 2026
Top 31%of 2026 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

6 positive, 6 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 3 critical, out of 17 comments about the project. Thread score +0.09.

Execution: 1 for, 3 againstDesign: 3 for, 0 againstDocs: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Visuals and animations look polished

    From 3 comments
    • Are these animated visualizations in the sky-explainer all original? If so, I am blown away by the visual consistency and meaningfulness of these throughout the article.
      webcoon on HN
    • The Fourier transform one is really cool. I loved the 5x oscilloscopes builder and the "draw your own wave" widget. Also, seeing the correlation coefficients of the 3Hz + 7Hz…
      Otterly99 on HN
    • Looking great, how did you standardized animations / canvas work? Did AI help?
      coulix on HN
  • Audio widgets and Fourier interactives work well

    From 2 comments
    • The Fourier transform audio examples fooled me. The example sounds and slider for them appeared consistent as far as I could tell... but then again I don't know much about…
      kelseydh on HN
    • The Fourier transform one is really cool. I loved the 5x oscilloscopes builder and the "draw your own wave" widget. Also, seeing the correlation coefficients of the 3Hz + 7Hz…
      Otterly99 on HN

Objections

  • Some facts are wrong, e.g. king-queen analogy fails in reverse

    From 2 comments
    • Kinda funny, because on the surface it looks really pretty, but if you dig a little deeper the flaws emerge. For example in the llm explainer section 3: king - man + woman =…
      datguyfromAT on HN
    • Pretty much, Ive tried the other examples and none of them work
      syl5x on HN
  • Accuracy of generated text is hard to trust without checking

    From 3 comments
    • There was a discussion yesterday that LLM generated “Show HN” posts should be moved to another thread :) Nevertheless, it looks nice but I can’t be sure that texts are correct.…
      sixtyj on HN
    • Are they accurate? How do you verify?
      verdverm on HN
    • One-shot - how did you review that the output is accurate?
      chinathrow on HN

Requests

  • Share prompts or md files

    From 1 comment
    • Please share prompts or md files so we can generate more!
      yu3zhou4 on HN
  • Link to primary sources like arXiv instead of generated citations

    From 1 comment
    • There was a discussion yesterday that LLM generated “Show HN” posts should be moved to another thread :) Nevertheless, it looks nice but I can’t be sure that texts are correct.…
      sixtyj on HN

Questions

  • How were the outputs verified for accuracy

    From 2 comments
  • How does calling Codex from Claude Code work

    From 1 comment
    • > Asking CC to verify its plan via codex How does this work? You tell it to call `codex exec`?
      energy123 on HN

Alternatives named

  • jezzamon.com Fourier explainer

    From 1 comment
    • If you liked that explanation of Fourier transforms, you'll probably like this one: https://www.jezzamon.com/fourier/index.html
      rstuart4133 on HN
  • explainextended.com

    From 1 comment
    • For the LLM explainer, did you point Claude at this one? https://explainextended.com/2023/12/31/happy-new-year-15/ This page Claude assisted page rhymes with that one. Sorta.
      rstuart4133 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/47058080)