Runloom

Languages and libraries

concurrency runtime

SHOW HN2026

47points
32comments
#1,260of 4,366 in 2026
Top 29%of 2026 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

2 positive, 7 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 5 critical, out of 15 comments about the project. Thread score -0.11.

Execution: 1 for, 4 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 againstIdea: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Impressive project

    From 2 comments
    • This is a seriously impressive project. I see your pitch is M:N work-stealing across real cores on free-threaded 3.13t/3.14t which i think is only possible because nogil now…
      ebeirne on HN
    • Nice! Having the history makes it easier to evaluate all the work you've put in, this is really impressive.
      simonw on HN

Objections

  • Codebase too large and built in one commit, hard to trust

    From 2 comments
    • This is an intimidating amount of code! 12,303 lines of C and 244,740 lines of Python, which looks to be a ton of monkeypatching plus huge amounts of test code. Only one commit…
      simonw on HN
    • 250k lines of code in one commit is reason enough to disregard the project entirely, IMO. Vibe code if one wants, but that is just madness...
      tfrancisl on HN
  • Monkeypatching is hard to maintain

    From 1 comment
    • I propose separating #1 (the main API/SDK) into a separate core package. This will be easier, smaller, and cleaner to maintain, and will meet the needs of many users with new…
      OutOfHere on HN
  • API and docs are messy

    From 1 comment
    • great questions: I'd say start here for some basics https://github.com/robertsdotpm/runloom/blob/main/docs/quickstart.md…
      Uptrenda on HN

Requests

  • Restore git history

    From 2 comments
    • Whether they did that or had an LLM one shot it, I dont really care. Commit history is pretty important if you ever want to try fixing bugs or improving features in the future.
      tfrancisl on HN
    • It might be worth recreating the git history from scratch in a way that excludes the markdown files - I've used Claude Code and OpenAI Codex to do that in the past with…
      simonw on HN
  • Separate core API from monkeypatching

    From 1 comment
    • I propose separating #1 (the main API/SDK) into a separate core package. This will be easier, smaller, and cleaner to maintain, and will meet the needs of many users with new…
      OutOfHere on HN

Questions

  • How does it compare with gevent?

    From 1 comment
  • Why not just use Go?

    From 2 comments

Alternatives named

  • gevent

    From 2 comments
    • How does this compare with gevent?
      ksdme9 on HN
    • > its hard to evaluate how much trust can be put in a project of this complexity at this early stage. I don't know, I'm not finding it hard to evaluate that at all. I've had bad…
      CamouflagedKiwi on HN
  • Go

    From 1 comment
  • Python threads and processes

    From 1 comment

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/48859387)