Mummify

Infrastructure

web archiving

SHOW HN2013

90points
66comments
#263of 1,739 in 2013
Top 16%of 2013 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

6 positive, 17 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 20 critical, out of 45 comments about the project. Thread score -0.27.

Idea: 4 for, 5 againstPricing: 0 for, 7 againstDesign: 2 for, 3 againstExecution: 0 for, 4 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Good branding and name, clean site design

    From 2 comments
    • This is an example of how great branding can help explain a product. Love the name, love the look, the copy is clever... but I don't like the low number of mummifications you get…
      contextual on HN
    • Just a thought: the "Link Rot" link should really be a Mummified link. I know Wikipedia isn't disappearing any time soon, but it just seemed silly to me not to "realise" the use…
      bjackman on HN
  • Real problem worth solving

    From 2 comments
    • The approach is nice, the problem being solved is real. Hopefully paying customers will flock in. The question: is mummify.it itself going to go under some day? So I'll wait for…
      nine_k on HN
    • Really like this, nice work. Is there a way to automatically mummify every link on an entire website or directory? Your method/service could be an interesting, easy to use way to…
      newrenowhore on HN

Objections

  • Mummy quota per plan is too low for the price

    From 4 comments
    • Weird pricing plan. At even the most expensive plan (of 15$/mo) only 50 'mummies' a month. Seems like an arbitrarily low number
      arb99 on HN
    • 50 mummies per month for the highest plan is way way way too low. It should 10,000 or even 50,000. Think about it this way: the people who are willing to pay you for this type of…
      AznHisoka on HN
    • Most of the time, one will not know which pages one links to will disappear in the future. This service therefore only seems really useful if you use it with every link you make.…
      gabemart on HN
    • I use evernote premium ($45/year) which is much cheaper and includes a tonne of extra features. Compare this to the pricing plan of mummify at $15/month pricing or $180/year. for…
      lingben on HN
  • Trust and longevity concerns; single point of failure

    From 2 comments
    • The approach is nice, the problem being solved is real. Hopefully paying customers will flock in. The question: is mummify.it itself going to go under some day? So I'll wait for…
      nine_k on HN
    • Interesting in light of this discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6504331 But to trust that something like this to make a permanent copy of stuff I'm linking to, I'd…
      jboynyc on HN
  • Requires JavaScript; blank page with NoScript

    From 2 comments
    • FYI, for those of us with Firefox's NoScript extension your site is completely broken. Nothing loads, it is just a blank page with a list of scripts you intend to run. I wasn't…
      tombrossman on HN
    • The OP depends upon Javascript for any and all content delivery/rendition. Given the topic at hand, I find this more than a bit ironic. I gather from the comments that this is…
      pasbesoin on HN
  • Copyright and DMCA takedown risk

    From 2 comments
    • How is Mummify going to get around the copyright implications of ripping off the now removed piece of content which they don't own? Also wondering: what happens if the publisher…
      lesinski on HN
    • One point to note is that a DMCA takedown targeted at Mummify.it will remove the content just as it would from the nytimes.com. If I manually save that content to disk then any…
      junto on HN

Requests

  • Export in standard WARC format

    From 2 comments
    • Its worth mentioning the http://archiveteam.org/ which does a lot of important web archival work. They use the Web ARChive format (WARC…
      donpdonp on HN
    • Just to second what donpdonp said (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6509604), I think a service like this needs to offer a standard format WARC…
      acdha on HN
  • Self-hosted or open-source version

    From 2 comments
    • The approach is nice, the problem being solved is real. Hopefully paying customers will flock in. The question: is mummify.it itself going to go under some day? So I'll wait for…
      nine_k on HN
    • This is pretty cool, I'd be happy with a service that mummified it to storage I control, since I've had pages that I've pointed to at archive.org vanish after the current…
      ChuckMcM on HN
  • Browser plugins

    From 1 comment
    • Not every page one visits is worth storing. The whole point is to filter out (and save) the good from the rest. An aside: Mummify needs browser plugins for all the major browser…
      contextual on HN
  • Bulk archiving of whole sites

    From 1 comment
    • Really like this, nice work. Is there a way to automatically mummify every link on an entire website or directory? Your method/service could be an interesting, easy to use way to…
      newrenowhore on HN

Questions

  • Which back-end web services does it depend on?

    From 1 comment
    • What Web services are you using in the back-end (that may potentially shut down)? I need my data accessible for low number of decades.
      alok-g on HN
  • Does it save video on pages?

    From 1 comment
    • Do you rip video on the page too? If so, I would definitely use this service. I've got videos with my company brand a bit everywhere and I can't find a good way to download it or…
      d0m on HN
  • What happens when a redirected URL changes?

    From 1 comment
    • How is Mummify going to get around the copyright implications of ripping off the now removed piece of content which they don't own? Also wondering: what happens if the publisher…
      lesinski on HN

Alternatives named

  • Archive.is

    From 2 comments
    • There are free alternatives, like Peeep.us [1] and Archive.is. [1]: http://www.peeep.us/ [2]: http://archive.is/
      hk__2 on HN
    • If it's something personal, I use http://archive.is with their bookmarklet in Chrome (free; unlimited archiving). It immediately renders the page, saves a copy with a unique url,…
      toomuchtodo on HN
  • Peeep.us

    From 1 comment
    • There are free alternatives, like Peeep.us [1] and Archive.is. [1]: http://www.peeep.us/ [2]: http://archive.is/
      hk__2 on HN
  • Wget with WARC output and Internet Archive

    From 1 comment
    • There already is an open source analog: http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Wget_with_WARC_output + http://archive.org/web/web.php
      toomuchtodo on HN
  • Scrapbook Firefox add-on

    From 1 comment
    • I have been using the Scrapbook add-on (see screenshots and manual here : [1]) in Firefox [2] for many years for this; it saves the web page to your local hard disk, and there…
      vijucat on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/6508787)