Harp

Infrastructure

hosting platform

SHOW HN2013

48points
27comments
#526of 1,739 in 2013
Top 31%of 2013 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

2 positive, 11 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 5 critical, out of 20 comments about the project. Thread score -0.17.

Privacy: 1 for, 2 againstDocs: 0 for, 2 againstIdea: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Looks good and useful to run on own hosting

    From 2 comments
    • Looks good. Wish it wasn't tied to Dropbox though. I'd almost definitely use it if I could work out of my own WebDAV server.
      Touche on HN
    • Well, good news for you, you can run the harp server on your own hosting! However, at that point I would just use the static site generator that I am accustomed to (Wintersmith).
      woah on HN
  • Congratulations on launch

    From 1 comment

Objections

  • Requests full read and modify Dropbox permissions, which is a privacy risk

    From 2 comments
    • I really, really would love to give this a try but am totally turned off by the requested "read and modify everything" Dropbox permissions. Although the Harp application does a…
      cookrn on HN
    • Same here. Have a new project I'm starting next week that this would be perfect with -- a small site with several collaborators that's not worthy of a full CMS, and everyone…
      silverlight on HN
  • Product positioning is unclear, mixing CLI, static site generator and hosted platform

    From 1 comment
    • I still think that the harp product (brand?) is all over the place. From what I've seen, harp is all of these things: - A command line utility for creating a…
      taylorlapeyre on HN
  • Tied to Dropbox; no WebDAV or other sync support

    From 1 comment
    • Looks good. Wish it wasn't tied to Dropbox though. I'd almost definitely use it if I could work out of my own WebDAV server.
      Touche on HN
  • Build step on the server adds needless complexity

    From 2 comments
    • Why do the build process (preprocessing) on the server?
      coderzach on HN
    • Not really, they still have to have node, npm, and the harp cli installed to use it locally. And if you're going through the work of doing all that, why not just do the build…
      coderzach on HN

Requests

  • Narrow Dropbox permissions or use a sandboxed folder

    From 2 comments
    • I really, really would love to give this a try but am totally turned off by the requested "read and modify everything" Dropbox permissions. Although the Harp application does a…
      cookrn on HN
    • Same here. Have a new project I'm starting next week that this would be perfect with -- a small site with several collaborators that's not worthy of a full CMS, and everyone…
      silverlight on HN
  • Support for other sync backends such as WebDAV

    From 1 comment
    • Looks good. Wish it wasn't tied to Dropbox though. I'd almost definitely use it if I could work out of my own WebDAV server.
      Touche on HN
  • Mention the sandbox workaround on the Dropbox denial warning page

    From 1 comment
    • What you've built looks great and I totally understand your rationale. It was just _scary_ to see that pop up. Did not think of the method described by @fjabre's comment and its…
      cookrn on HN

Questions

  • Why run the build step on the server

    From 1 comment
  • Can a second Dropbox account be used to limit access

    From 1 comment
    • maybe I'm missing something but why not just signup for another dropbox account and use that one for this instead?
      fjabre on HN

Alternatives named

  • Jekyll

    From 1 comment
    • I still think that the harp product (brand?) is all over the place. From what I've seen, harp is all of these things: - A command line utility for creating a…
      taylorlapeyre on HN
  • Wintersmith

    From 1 comment
    • Well, good news for you, you can run the harp server on your own hosting! However, at that point I would just use the static site generator that I am accustomed to (Wintersmith).
      woah on HN
  • Wordpress hosted and self-hosted

    From 1 comment
    • It's mainly between HarpJS.com and harp.io, where on HarpJS there's a command line utility that works like a static site generator, and on harp.io it's hosted. I think it works…
      krrishd on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/6739175)