2019

AI

self-driving model

SHOW HN2019

144points
58comments
#304of 2,195 in 2019
Top 14%of 2019 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

9 positive, 16 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 5 critical, out of 31 comments about the project. Thread score +0.05.

Design: 0 for, 2 againstExecution: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Impressive work for a young developer

    From 3 comments
    • > At the current state of my model the model basically just clones the human driver as good as possible. That means the the amount of brake is higher in curves I read in another…
      pathsjs on HN
    • Great job! This is amazing. Love how I’m you used off-the-shelf components. Congrats and keep going!!
      nikodunk on HN
    • Holy crap. First: you're awesome. Keep it up. Second: anyone else think this is a great example of how autonomous driving is a last-mile problem?
      rpmisms on HN

Objections

  • Neural network alone is unsafe for safety-critical driving

    From 2 comments
    • Seems really scary to exclusively use a neural network for safety-critical tasks like this, without having an explicit method guaranteeing safety. You can't prove that a trained…
      devit on HN
    • The risk is extremely high.
      littlemtman on HN
  • Braking before curves is not how most drivers behave

    From 2 comments
    • > At the current state of my model the model basically just clones the human driver as good as possible. That means the the amount of brake is higher in curves I read in another…
      pathsjs on HN
    • You are conflating effective driving habits with actual driving habits. I'd say less than 5% of drivers in the states properly brake before curves and accelerate through. Hell,…
      hugey010 on HN

Requests

  • Add temporal context from previous frames

    From 1 comment
    • good start op. a good next step is add in temporal context (previous frame information) so model may resolve ambiguous cases. see e.g. breakdown of comma.ai openpilot model here…
      czr on HN
  • Lead with demos and failure cases

    From 1 comment
    • good start op. a good next step is add in temporal context (previous frame information) so model may resolve ambiguous cases. see e.g. breakdown of comma.ai openpilot model here…
      czr on HN

Questions

  • How is overfitting handled given held-out test data

    From 1 comment
    • How big of a risk is overfitting for these kinds of models? I think common practice is to hold back some of the data for testing.
      billsmithaustin on HN
  • Why ELU activation works better than ReLU

    From 2 comments
    • You do something similar in Udacity's SDC nanodegree but you use their simulator rather than a new car. Interestingly through trial and error on my project, ELU activation…
      syntaxing on HN
    • Thanks for the answer! I also used Relu with no luck either. I figured Relu would work better than ELU but it didn't work for this application. Would you happen to know why ELU…
      syntaxing on HN

Alternatives named

  • comma.ai openpilot

    From 1 comment
    • good start op. a good next step is add in temporal context (previous frame information) so model may resolve ambiguous cases. see e.g. breakdown of comma.ai openpilot model here…
      czr on HN
  • Tesla Autopilot

    From 1 comment
    • >A few days ago @karpathy presented their workflow with PyTorch and also said some numbers, to train the Autopilot system with all it neural networks you would have to spend…
      daenz on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/21558343)