Sat

Infrastructure

wasm runtime server

SHOW HN2021

51points
20comments
#844of 2,533 in 2021
Top 34%of 2021 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

2 positive, 13 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 1 critical, out of 16 comments about the project. Thread score -0.02.

Performance: 1 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Interesting WebAssembly serverless direction

    From 2 comments
    • Hi ospencer, cohix, nyahmacklindev, and jagger27: - Could you share some insights on why wasmtime and not wasm3 or wasmer in particular (other than the fact that the…
      ignoramous on HN
    • The end goal is that Docker isn't needed at all, you could just run Sat on bare metal and you'd get all the nice sandboxing properties of Wasm. That said, the tooling in the…
      cohix on HN

Objections

  • Hello world wasm module is large (1.73 MB)

    From 2 comments
    • The hello world example in the repo is 1.73 MB edit: thanks for the replies below, I misinterpreted the use case for that wasm module.
      hunterb123 on HN
    • Right! I'll also just mention that this Wasm module isn't sent to the clients and run in the browser. It runs server-side. And for a bit of context, the hello world example below…
      jagger27 on HN

Questions

  • Why Wasmtime over wasm3 or Wasmer

    From 2 comments
    • Hi ospencer, cohix, nyahmacklindev, and jagger27: - Could you share some insights on why wasmtime and not wasm3 or wasmer in particular (other than the fact that the…
      ignoramous on HN
    • Hello! > Could you share some insights on why wasmtime and not wasm3 or wasmer in particular The underlying architecture also supports Wasmer (there's a compiler flag to switch…
      cohix on HN
  • What the local network mesh feature implies

    From 1 comment
    • This appear to be using Wasmtime to run the WASM. The main point seems to be: > Sat has the ability to create a mesh with other instances using local network discovery and…
      Zababa on HN
  • Difference from wasm-micro-runtime

    From 2 comments
    • What's the difference behind this and https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime? I'm using wasm-micro-runtime at https://www.inngest.com to transform events on the…
      tonyhb on HN
    • Sat is a pre-built server and a set of APIs wrapped around Wasmtime, it could theoretically use WAMR as well!
      cohix on HN

Alternatives named

  • wasmCloud, Lunatic, Yew, AssemblyLift, Compute@Edge

    From 1 comment
    • Hello! > Could you share some insights on why wasmtime and not wasm3 or wasmer in particular The underlying architecture also supports Wasmer (there's a compiler flag to switch…
      cohix on HN
  • wasm-micro-runtime (WAMR)

    From 1 comment
    • What's the difference behind this and https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime? I'm using wasm-micro-runtime at https://www.inngest.com to transform events on the…
      tonyhb on HN
  • Cloudflare Workers and Deno Deploy

    From 2 comments
    • Hi ospencer, cohix, nyahmacklindev, and jagger27: - Could you share some insights on why wasmtime and not wasm3 or wasmer in particular (other than the fact that the…
      ignoramous on HN
    • Hi: Yes, we use WASM by the way of Deno-Deploy and Cloudflare Workers but for web & logging workloads. We do not have a specific need for WASM but it speed: It is faster than any…
      ignoramous on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/28788303)