Errorception

Dev tools

error tracking

SHOW HN2011

76points
54comments
#158of 1,097 in 2011
Top 15%of 2011 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

8 positive, 10 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 11 critical, out of 29 comments about the project. Thread score -0.12.

Docs: 0 for, 6 againstIdea: 3 for, 1 againstExecution: 2 for, 2 againstPricing: 1 for, 2 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful in practice and responsive author

    From 3 comments
    • I've used Errorception for one of my products and was very happy with the service provided by the author. Thanks.
      nashjain on HN
    • Congrats, I have worked with errorception, found it really useful. Thanks.
      acharekar on HN
    • no problem, it's working nicely, I have a few errors to fix now, cheers :) edit: it would be nice to see some data aggregated and fed back into the community so that issues with…
      tudorw on HN
  • Found real bugs quickly, such as an IE 7 bug

    From 2 comments
    • Found an IE 7 bug in less than a minute <3
      htilford on HN
    • no problem, it's working nicely, I have a few errors to fix now, cheers :) edit: it would be nice to see some data aggregated and fed back into the community so that issues with…
      tudorw on HN

Objections

  • Value proposition and sales pitch are vague

    From 2 comments
    • Your product is for people who write code, but your sales pitch is some vaporous hand-wavy thing. I'm writing my own guide on quality JavaScript, and I have absolutely no idea of…
      bdg on HN
    • If you're product it targeting developers, as I'm sure a "High performance JavaScript error tracking" service would be. I would hope that the "Features" page would be a bit more…
      iambot on HN
  • Per-exception pricing conflicts with reducing errors

    From 1 comment
    • I can see some problems with your "per-exception" pricing model. If your product works and adds value, it will result in the reduction of exceptions. A reduction in the number of…
      dclaysmith on HN
  • Building a basic version is trivial with window.onerror and a database

    From 2 comments
    • Your product is for people who write code, but your sales pitch is some vaporous hand-wavy thing. I'm writing my own guide on quality JavaScript, and I have absolutely no idea of…
      bdg on HN
    • Sure, but that feature seems trivial to me, I can simply create a view in my database to shake the data however I would like. https://gist.github.com/1438654 I could just select…
      bdg on HN
  • Docs lack detail on how the service works

    From 3 comments
    • How, precisely, does your service interact with my code? What does an error report look like? This should be on the front page. Also, "How can I pay for errorception? I'm working…
      endian on HN
    • You need to provide more information how the service works, what kind of data and how you can get etc.
      angry-hacker on HN
    • If you're product it targeting developers, as I'm sure a "High performance JavaScript error tracking" service would be. I would hope that the "Features" page would be a bit more…
      iambot on HN

Requests

  • Stack traces

    From 1 comment
  • Mobile browser support

    From 2 comments
    • What's the support like for mobile browsers? Debugging mobile webkit is a pain. It'd be nice to see some screenshots on the site too.
      colinramsay on HN
    • mobile support would rock my world :)
      tudorw on HN
  • Demo video or screenshots

    From 2 comments
    • Seems to be interesting. Do you have a demo video? Will this work in all the browsers? Any browser restrictions?
      narad on HN
    • What's the support like for mobile browsers? Debugging mobile webkit is a pain. It'd be nice to see some screenshots on the site too.
      colinramsay on HN
  • Better grouping and actionable information

    From 1 comment
    • We've tried 2 or 3 existing Javascript error tracking systems in the past. None of them helped much. Performance is not the feature I care about. On the other hand, I would be…
      gregdetre on HN

Questions

  • What data is reported and in what format

    From 1 comment
    • Some things off the top of my head: What info do you report back? What format is it? Do you handle different types of errors? And if so how do you report them? Do you plan on…
      iambot on HN
  • Browser and user-agent reporting

    From 2 comments
    • As an Aside: I would hope that you're sending back info on the user-agent as well (I only say this because you've not mentioned it). When an error is encountered it makes all the…
      iambot on HN
    • I'm with iambot. In almost all cases knowing the browser and versions makes the difference.
      sdepablos on HN

Alternatives named

  • Muscula

    From 1 comment
    • I came across http://www.muscula.com/ over the weekend, and they seem to be farther along with this kind of a product in terms of features (not to discourage you, just to give…
      dolinsky on HN
  • Airbrake

    From 1 comment
    • I suppose the main advantage would be information aggregation with each error next to the number of occurrences (I don't want to see a hundred times the same error), the same…
      sdepablos on HN
  • Getexceptional

    From 1 comment
    • I suppose the main advantage would be information aggregation with each error next to the number of occurrences (I don't want to see a hundred times the same error), the same…
      sdepablos on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/3319099)