Porter Cloud

Infrastructure

platform as a service

SHOW HN2024

258points
95comments
#286of 3,515 in 2024
Top 9%of 2024 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

12 positive, 33 neutral or asking, 4 mixed, 12 critical, out of 61 comments about the project. Thread score +0.03.

Idea: 7 for, 7 againstPricing: 0 for, 5 againstExecution: 3 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Migrating from Heroku was easy and saved substantial cost

    From 2 comments
    • We migrated from Heroku to Porter at work (at my behest). Still one of the better bets I’ve taken. There is definitely still some more devops overhead compared to Heroku, and I…
      hahahacorn on HN
    • At HomeLight we migrated from Heroku to Porter and it has been great. The team has been super helpful, the platform as stable as you can get, and the cost savings have been…
      malyk on HN
  • Helpful, friendly support team

    From 2 comments
    • We migrated microservices from Heroku to Porter, and also from standalone VMs and K8s running on AWS to Porter. As a coder trying to do both dev and devops on a tiny team, it was…
      jedwhite on HN
    • At HomeLight we migrated from Heroku to Porter and it has been great. The team has been super helpful, the platform as stable as you can get, and the cost savings have been…
      malyk on HN
  • Eject option avoids vendor lock-in

    From 2 comments
    • Congrats on the launch guys! This is a great feature, in a world where most companies try to increase lock in! Huge fans of Porter, we've been using them for a number of years at…
      wmab on HN
    • Had this exact problem (Heroku Postgres to RDS) at my old co. Data migration went as bad as it possibly could (dropped indices, foreign keys, everything but the data itself).…
      bkitano19 on HN

Objections

  • Starting on a PaaS seems pointless when GCP or AWS can be used directly with little lock-in

    From 3 comments
    • I personally don't get it. You can start on GCP today, without being tied to GCP much at all. It isn't even expensive to do so. Is there something I'm missing here? Cloud…
      latchkey on HN
    • > We want the process of moving from Porter Cloud to one of the hyperscalers as arbitrary as a click of a button. What I don't understand is why someone would start with Porter…
      latchkey on HN
    • I have never quite understood this value proposition (maybe I am not the target audience?) The point of PaaS is to avoid DevOps... making a PasS with an eject just feels…
      MobileVet on HN
  • Pricing seems high compared with Fly.io, Render and Heroku

    From 3 comments
    • It's a great idea, but the pricing seems high - $30/month minimum? I'm running 3 apps on Fly.io and I'm still so low in the pricing that they're invoicing me $0. I will pay for…
      davedx on HN
    • I don't understand the developer's pricing (new offering) which is as below: $10 per month GB RAM $20 per month vCPU As compared to standard pricing which is: $6 per month GB RAM…
      dockerd on HN
    • Hey thanks for sharing. You mention 3x cheaper than Heroku, but the pricing page specifies $10 per month GB RAM, $20 per month vCPU. I'm having a hard time to compare with Heroku…
      pil0u on HN
  • No free tier and credit card paywall

    From 2 comments
    • not sure where you saw $30/month minimum! There's no minimum spend on Porter, and you just pay for what you use as low as a 0.1 CPU and 1MB RAM. We do not have a free tier however.
      sungrokshim on HN
    • Credit card paywall, so I'd recommend to check Render or Koyeb for these people who prefer to save their time.
      paulcarroty on HN
  • Product is less mature with more devops overhead than Heroku

    From 1 comment
    • We migrated from Heroku to Porter at work (at my behest). Still one of the better bets I’ve taken. There is definitely still some more devops overhead compared to Heroku, and I…
      hahahacorn on HN

Requests

  • Support for Hetzner, DigitalOcean and bare metal

    From 4 comments
  • Support for AWS GovCloud

    From 1 comment
  • GPU support in Porter Cloud

    From 1 comment
    • talk to me about GPU’s? I saw some gpu_node config stuff in your documentation a couple days ago. If Porter can host GPU’s, that’s a superpower render.com doesn’t have.
      adenta on HN

Questions

  • What is the business model, especially for the eject feature?

    From 2 comments
    • I looked into porter at the time we were migrating from Heroku to AWS! I thought it would have been a great solution if it was mature when we first started on heroku. At this…
      mushufasa on HN
    • I meant: what's the business model for Eject specifically? Why make it easy for customers to leave (aside from pre-empting buying-decision concerns)
      mushufasa on HN
  • How does it compare to Render, Fly.io, Coolify or CapRover?

    From 2 comments
    • Is the eject button the only thing that makes Porter more appealing than something like Fly.io or Render? They too automate a lot of stuff but for a better price.
      sosodev on HN
    • How does this compare to Coolify/CapRover
      localfirst on HN
  • Why use it instead of starting directly on a cloud provider?

    From 1 comment
    • > We want the process of moving from Porter Cloud to one of the hyperscalers as arbitrary as a click of a button. What I don't understand is why someone would start with Porter…
      latchkey on HN

Alternatives named

  • Render

    From 2 comments
    • I have never quite understood this value proposition (maybe I am not the target audience?) The point of PaaS is to avoid DevOps... making a PasS with an eject just feels…
      MobileVet on HN
    • Credit card paywall, so I'd recommend to check Render or Koyeb for these people who prefer to save their time.
      paulcarroty on HN
  • Fly.io

    From 2 comments
    • It's a great idea, but the pricing seems high - $30/month minimum? I'm running 3 apps on Fly.io and I'm still so low in the pricing that they're invoicing me $0. I will pay for…
      davedx on HN
    • Is the eject button the only thing that makes Porter more appealing than something like Fly.io or Render? They too automate a lot of stuff but for a better price.
      sosodev on HN
  • Hatchbox

    From 1 comment
    • This is a great idea. For our startup, we instead use Hatchbox [1]. It provides us with that one-click PaaS experience while allowing us to run on your preferred platform (AWS).…
      schappim on HN
  • Cloud66

    From 1 comment
    • I wonder how that category of services, which Porter provides could be called. I would put the following services in that category: - Porter - Cloud66 https://www.cloud66.com -…
      tmaier on HN
  • Northflank

    From 1 comment
    • I highly recommend checking out Northflank. Their pricing is a lot friendlier. https://northflank.com/
      PapaPalpatine on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/40456959)