website

Productivity

research paper discovery

SHOW HN2026

200points
79comments
#291of 4,366 in 2026
Top 7%of 2026 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

14 positive, 15 neutral or asking, 3 mixed, 22 critical, out of 54 comments about the project. Thread score -0.17.

Idea: 7 for, 13 againstExecution: 4 for, 2 againstDesign: 1 for, 2 againstPerformance: 0 for, 2 againstPricing: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Interesting concept for paper discovery

    From 3 comments
    • Extremely interesting concept. I think it will be maybe hard to get a user base due to the scientific community itself not completely being "tik tok" people. Of course there are…
      habitit on HN
    • I think it's a cool idea. It could be great for discovering new papers in a fun way.
      ksd482 on HN
    • I like the idea. As others suggested it might be a good idea to drop the branding. Had the same considerations when I built a “Tinder” (1) for RSS Feeds. In the end it worked…
      7777777phil on HN

Objections

  • Social network model may not gain traction with researchers

    From 3 comments
    • I love this and wanted to build this - but https://www.alphaxiv.org/ already exists, and it gets no social action (hardly any papers have comments), so this makes me doubtful…
      dennisy on HN
    • People will not flock somewhere unless they sense some potential return on investment. If a website looks like it will disappear in a few months, it does not make sense for a…
      smokel on HN
    • Extremely interesting concept. I think it will be maybe hard to get a user base due to the scientific community itself not completely being "tik tok" people. Of course there are…
      habitit on HN
  • AI-generated summaries may be factually incorrect

    From 2 comments
    • I think the AI portion is not just something that ought have a toggle, but it should not be part of the platform. Somewhat recently, the ACM (one of the premier publishers for…
      DonaldPShimoda on HN
    • This is exactly the problem with science reporting. All things can go wrong like click bait, out of context conclusions etc will go wrong.
      vinni2 on HN
  • TikTok comparison is off-putting for the audience

    From 3 comments
    • Just wanted to maybe make a light suggestions that, for marketing purposes, this really doesn't need any suggestion of TikTok and also might benefit from less heavy handed…
      kamranjon on HN
    • I think there is something to it. It seems that "TikTok" part is actually minimal, but it is bound, from purely marketing perspective, to drive some people here away. You might…
      iugtmkbdfil834 on HN
    • Yeah, I have an allergic reaction to tiktok being mixed up in any serious intellectual pursuit. :-)
      AlexCoventry on HN
  • Performance is poor and the site is slow to scroll

    From 2 comments
    • Web site maxes out cpu utilization. Scrolls like PowerPoint 2003. Firefox 140 on Debian 12. Web design has gotten so terrible over the years. HN is an example of an extremely…
      skillina on HN
    • Windows 2000 works faster in my browser..
      zb3 on HN

Requests

  • Offer an accountless web version

    From 2 comments
    • Accountless Web version?
      utopiah on HN
    • Good idea. Right now I started with iOS because I wanted to experiment with the reading/saving flow and on-device features, but an accountless web preview would probably make…
      ciwrl on HN
  • Drop the TikTok and AI branding

    From 2 comments
    • Just wanted to maybe make a light suggestions that, for marketing purposes, this really doesn't need any suggestion of TikTok and also might benefit from less heavy handed…
      kamranjon on HN
    • I like the idea. As others suggested it might be a good idea to drop the branding. Had the same considerations when I built a “Tinder” (1) for RSS Feeds. In the end it worked…
      7777777phil on HN
  • Support for Android

    From 1 comment
    • Already "too many signups" at 13 votes, ruh roh This looks amazing. I hope Android will be an option.
      boutell on HN

Questions

  • Can the AI part be turned off?

    From 1 comment
  • How is this different from NotebookLM?

    From 1 comment
    • How is this diferent from https://notebooklm.google.com?
      bixxie09 on HN

Alternatives named

  • alphaxiv

    From 1 comment
    • I love this and wanted to build this - but https://www.alphaxiv.org/ already exists, and it gets no social action (hardly any papers have comments), so this makes me doubtful…
      dennisy on HN
  • Semantic Scholar

    From 1 comment
    • People will not flock somewhere unless they sense some potential return on investment. If a website looks like it will disappear in a few months, it does not make sense for a…
      smokel on HN
  • SciRate

    From 1 comment
    • Scirate.com has been going since before 2010 and still active as far as I'm aware. Mostly used by quantum info folks though.
      n4r9 on HN
  • NotebookLM

    From 1 comment
    • How is this diferent from https://notebooklm.google.com?
      bixxie09 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/48096842)