Zipline

Finance and crypto

algorithmic trading

SHOW HN2013

157points
30comments
#109of 1,739 in 2013
Top 7%of 2013 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

5 positive, 4 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 3 critical, out of 12 comments about the project. Thread score +0.15.

Idea: 3 for, 0 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Open sourcing the trading code is commendable

    From 2 comments
    • It's super cool to see these guys open source the code that runs their project.
      msandford on HN
    • Quantopian presented at the New York Software Engineers meetup last week. As somebody who has built proprietary backtesting software before, I applaud their open-source approach…
      qntmfred on HN

Objections

  • Retail traders are at a disadvantage and will likely lose money

    From 1 comment
    • I work at an algorithmic trading shop and have spent a fair amount of time studying equity market structure. It's great to see an open source trading platform, but I think it's…
      anonDataUser on HN
  • Backtest results like the 4000% example are unrealistic

    From 1 comment
    • The "Hello World" sample algorithm on Quantopian gets a 4000% return if it operates on AAPL for a year. It makes trades each minute using a "3 day volume-weighted-average-price."…
      babl on HN
  • Title suggests live trading but project is a backtester

    From 1 comment
    • The topic of this post seems a little off. The description of zipline on its github page is "financial backtester for trading algorithms written in Python" which is a bit…
      xntrk on HN

Requests

  • Options data with implied volatility

    From 1 comment
    • This looks pretty good. You already have competitors out there like Collective2. It'd be nice if you guys can get options data with IV; it's probably harder to get data licenses…
      noname123 on HN
  • Live trading support and broker data source integration

    From 2 comments
    • I'm one of the co-maintainers of the project. You're right that there is a chasm between backtesting and actual trading. The title may be a little future thinking, we are working…
      edhebert on HN
    • You'll have to roll your own backtester though when you build your own historical DB. Or you could just PR a new data source class for Zipline that pulls data from IB. Ah, the…
      jik on HN

Questions

  • What is the advantage over MetaTrader Expert Advisors

    From 1 comment
    • What is the real advantage of this over Expert Advisor on Metatrader ?
      tensaix2j on HN
  • Which brokers have good APIs

    From 1 comment
    • If you decided to use an algorithm for real-world investing, what brokers would you recommend that have good APIs?
      babl on HN

Alternatives named

  • Interactive Brokers

    From 2 comments
    • Checkout http://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/main.php and http://www.lightspeed.com/
      fawce on HN
    • I think interactive brokers is one of the common choices for people who don't have the resources/money to get direct exchange connections or similar.
      ios84dev on HN
  • Collective2

    From 2 comments
    • This looks pretty good. You already have competitors out there like Collective2. It'd be nice if you guys can get options data with IV; it's probably harder to get data licenses…
      noname123 on HN
    • Given most brokers transaction fee model, I don't think you'd want to algo trade with much less than that. Though iirc Collective2 lets you test strategies for free:…
      SkyMarshal on HN
  • MetaTrader Expert Advisors

    From 1 comment
    • What is the real advantage of this over Expert Advisor on Metatrader ?
      tensaix2j on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/5150546)