Floobits

Dev tools

pair programming

SHOW HN2013

375points
135comments
#20of 1,739 in 2013
Top 2%of 2013 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

31 positive, 54 neutral or asking, 6 mixed, 20 critical, out of 111 comments about the project. Thread score +0.08.

Idea: 17 for, 4 againstExecution: 2 for, 10 againstPricing: 4 for, 1 againstDesign: 0 for, 3 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful for remote pair programming and teaching

    From 3 comments
    • We use Floobits a few times a week to pair and it's incredible.
      stevenklein on HN
    • Holy cow this is an awesome concept. Haven't tried it yet, but if it works it's completely transformative. Can be used as a teaching tool for anything - not just for pair…
      jalopy on HN
    • So this could potentially become a pair programming tool that would allow a single person to oversee the work of several people too. Could be good for remote education. In fact I…
      ThomPete on HN
  • Impressive concept

    From 2 comments
    • Holy cow this is an awesome concept. Haven't tried it yet, but if it works it's completely transformative. Can be used as a teaching tool for anything - not just for pair…
      jalopy on HN
    • New ways to collaborate remotely and easily are valuable. Travel time is a waste. David Socha from the University of Washington is looking for teams to video for his research…
      efm on HN

Objections

  • Private workspaces limited on free plan, confusing

    From 2 comments
    • Looks great, going to try it out. Some feedback: it seems I was able to do a private session on the free plan, but the error message indicates I've used 1 out of 0 private…
      yesimahuman on HN
    • This needs to be communicated better. I signed up, created a session, but when I tried to make the session private I got the message about being over the limit and assumed that…
      mef on HN
  • Buggy plugins, especially Emacs and Sublime on Linux

    From 3 comments
    • Been watching this for awhile, it's what we've wanted for years now (we thought about building this as dev offering for Bushido's platform). Finally giving it a go in emacs, I…
      sgrove on HN
    • This still had a bunch of issues when I tried it: The user I connected with saw many instances of my user because I was trying to connect with Sublime Text, and couldn't give…
      mustardhamsters on HN
    • Getting an error Unable to create workspace: <urlopen error unknown url type: https> Have tried both the master branch and teh 0.17.5 tag. Same issue. The package control install…
      kapad on HN
  • Server-based design raises privacy and security concerns

    From 3 comments
    • Why does it have to be organized around a centralized server requiring user accounts? Why not make it peer to peer instead? Haven't we learned our lesson?
      plg on HN
    • Can you comment on the technical details on how this works at the network level? How secure is this?
      ctb_mg on HN
    • Any support for private networks or networks not on the internet? Not everyone wants/can send their code through a third party.
      RobotCaleb on HN

Requests

  • Support for IntelliJ and other JetBrains editors

    From 3 comments
    • Holy cow this is an awesome concept. Haven't tried it yet, but if it works it's completely transformative. Can be used as a teaching tool for anything - not just for pair…
      jalopy on HN
    • Hopefully they will create a plugin for RubyMine. Not sure, but maybe if they create a plugin for IntelliJ, they'd cover the entire family of Jetbrains editors? (IntelliJ,…
      aantix on HN
    • IntelliJ please.. There are plenty of people uses it who loves pair programming
      vadivlkumar on HN
  • Self-hosted or private network option

    From 2 comments
    • Any support for private networks or networks not on the internet? Not everyone wants/can send their code through a third party.
      RobotCaleb on HN
    • Looks great - any plans to offer self-hosted for those who want behind-the-firewall solutions?
      GrinningFool on HN
  • Visual Studio support

    From 1 comment
    • This is quite awesome - Visual Studio support would rock!
      shaunol on HN

Questions

  • How does it differ from screen or terminal sharing

    From 1 comment
    • So um..... call me ignorant, but how is this any different from: person 1: ``` screen -t "foo" ``` person 2: ``` ssh person1@blahblah.com screen -x "foo" ``` ??
      cheesylard on HN
  • How does the network and security model work

    From 1 comment
    • Can you comment on the technical details on how this works at the network level? How secure is this?
      ctb_mg on HN

Alternatives named

  • GNU screen shared sessions

    From 1 comment
    • So um..... call me ignorant, but how is this any different from: person 1: ``` screen -t "foo" ``` person 2: ``` ssh person1@blahblah.com screen -x "foo" ``` ??
      cheesylard on HN
  • ScreenHero

    From 2 comments
    • Looks interesting, but I get the feeling using something like ScreenHero would work better. I've used ScreenHero for sort-of pair programming and it works extremely well + it's…
      jhartikainen on HN
    • Glad to see more people experimenting in this space! Currently I'm using sqwiggle + screenhero and it'd be killer if they could somehow have a baby together. Screenhero allows me…
      agentultra on HN
  • Madeye.io

    From 1 comment

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/6064608)