TinyClock

Productivity

desktop clock widget

SHOW HN2022

192points
68comments
#299of 2,570 in 2022
Top 12%of 2022 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

4 positive, 22 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 7 critical, out of 33 comments about the project. Thread score -0.01.

Execution: 1 for, 7 againstPerformance: 2 for, 0 againstIdea: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

Objections

  • Does not run on current Intel macOS because it lacks an x86_64 slice

    From 3 comments
    • Curiously it doesn't seem to run on my Intel Macbook running Big Sur - the icon is crossed out and I get > “TinyClock.app” needs to be updated. > The developer of this app needs…
      donatj on HN
    • It only has i386, ppc, and arm64 slices. So, an Intel Mac running recent macOS won't be able to launch it as it does not have an x86_64 slice (32-bit x86 execution having been…
      theg5prank on HN
    • It's not confused; as noted in Known Bugs: > Unlike done in previous project, netop Tiger SDKs (used to build several intermediate binaries) don’t contain 64-bit AppKit versions,…
      JonathonW on HN
  • Not truly 5-arch; the release has only three architectures

    From 2 comments
    • Seems like it’s literally not “5-arch” then. 32 bit PPC, 64 bit PPC, 32 bit X86, 64 bit ARM.
      Pulcinella on HN
    • It actually doesn’t have ppc64 either. Just 3 slices.
      theg5prank on HN
  • Fails to load on Mac OS X 10.0

    From 1 comment
    • Doesn't work on 10.0: https://0x0.st/ofjW.png Not only does the binary not load, but the dmg itself won't extract, it just opens to a blank Disk Copy window no matter what you…
      ranger_danger on HN

Requests

  • Port to NeXTSTEP/OpenStep or other older systems

    From 1 comment
    • Would it be possible to create a true universal binary that also runs on NeXT/Openstep on 68k, SPARC, PA-RISC and x86 as well as Rhapsody on PPC and x86?
      johndoe0815 on HN
  • Support for classic Mac System 6

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • What does 5-arch mean?

    From 1 comment
    • What does 5-arch mean? Single Google yielded nothing (which may be more of a comment on Google's quality as of late)
      digb on HN
  • How does the Bazaar clone URL work?

    From 1 comment
    • OT, but as someone who's never used Bazaar, how does this work? ``` bzr clone https://tycho.sytes.net/TinyClock/ ``` EDIT: To clarify, I'm curious since this is the same URL I'm…
      cglong on HN

Alternatives named

  • XLD (X Lossless Decoder) as a universal macOS app

    From 1 comment
    • A much more impressive universal macOS application in my mind is the X Lossless Decoder (XLD), which you can run natively on PowerPC (32), Intel (32/64) and ARM (64). Not only is…
      Hamuko on HN
  • X11 clients such as oclock and aclock

    From 2 comments
    • For a bit of comparison, Windows 2.03's (analog!) clock: ``` CLOCK EXE 8960 9-04-87 11:11a ``` ...will run on Windows 2.0 up to Windows 10 x86.
      userbinator on HN
    • OClock and "aclock" statically built can be run under older kernels up to today's distros. Oh, and it will run and render over the network with paleolitic Unixen thanks to X :).
      anthk on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/32753471)